Clark Williams wrote:
> If the above are correct and the only issue here is that we have
> different depsolving with yum versus dnf, let's detect that we're
> building a Fedora package on EPEL and print a warning to that effect. I
> don't think it does us any good to ship a configuration that won't
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:56:59AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 02/14/2015 04:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > IMHO, it is the job of the EPEL package of mock to disable the
> > config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf' option in the shipped version of the
> > Rawhide configs.
>
> But then you w
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:05:35 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > On 02/14/2015 04:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> IMHO, it is the job of the EPEL package of mock to disable the
> >> config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf' option in the shipped version of
> >> the Rawhide confi
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 02/14/2015 04:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> IMHO, it is the job of the EPEL package of mock to disable the
>> config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf' option in the shipped version of
>> the Rawhide configs.
>
> But then you will not be warned that your results may differ
On 02/14/2015 04:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> IMHO, it is the job of the EPEL package of mock to disable the
> config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf' option in the shipped version of the
> Rawhide configs.
But then you will not be warned that your results may differ from Koji.
--
Miroslav Such
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Could it be an idea to check if /usr/bin/dnf exists (or if dnf can be
> found in $PATH) before calling dnf and if not a) warn the user and b)
> switch back to yum?
>
> This would make mock run out of the box for RHEL/EPEL users as well.
IMHO, it is the job of the EPEL
On 13. 2. 2015 at 19:10:01, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Friday, February 13, 2015, Pierre-Yves Chibon
>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> >
> > RHEL/EPEL users do not have DNF available, therefore they are unable to
> >
> > > build packages for Fedo
On Friday, February 13, 2015, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> RHEL/EPEL users do not have DNF available, therefore they are unable to
> > build packages for Fedora Rawhide. There is however a workaround. Just
> > change this line:
> >
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> Hi,
> I just released mock-1.2.7. It have - beside one small bug and new F22
> configs - one important change.
>
> The rawhide configs have this one line included:
> config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf'
> which means that Mock w
Hi,
I just released mock-1.2.7. It have - beside one small bug and new F22
configs - one important change.
The rawhide configs have this one line included:
config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf'
which means that Mock will use DNF for building packages for rawhide
targets. There are two conse
10 matches
Mail list logo
