Re: Mock config for epel-next-9-x86_64, No march for argument: fedpkg-minimal

2021-12-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 06. 12. 21 20:52, Ben Beasley wrote: Interestingly, I’m able to do local EPEL9 builds on F35 by using “fedpkg --release epel9 mockbuild”, which seems to use an environment called “epel9-candidate-${ARCH}”. I haven’t looked into where that comes from. It doesn’t correspond to anything in

Re: Mock config for epel-next-9-x86_64, No march for argument: fedpkg-minimal

2021-12-06 Thread Ben Beasley
Interestingly, I’m able to do local EPEL9 builds on F35 by using “fedpkg --release epel9 mockbuild”, which seems to use an environment called “epel9-candidate-${ARCH}”. I haven’t looked into where that comes from. It doesn’t correspond to anything in /etc/mock. – Ben On 12/6/21 12:36,

Re: Mock config for epel-next-9-x86_64, No march for argument: fedpkg-minimal

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 11:32 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 01:30:38PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Is this a known issue or is there a package I need to update? I'm on F35. > > It's sadly expected... we need to get fedpkg-minimal pushed out into > epel9. There's a bug on it:

Re: Mock config for epel-next-9-x86_64, No march for argument: fedpkg-minimal

2021-12-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 01:30:38PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > Is this a known issue or is there a package I need to update? I'm on F35. It's sadly expected... we need to get fedpkg-minimal pushed out into epel9. There's a bug on it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007051

Mock config for epel-next-9-x86_64, No march for argument: fedpkg-minimal

2021-12-05 Thread Richard Shaw
Is this a known issue or is there a package I need to update? I'm on F35. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: