Re: Modularity documentation [was Re: The future of Fedora Server...] Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change))

2020-12-11 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:52 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > Thanks for filing this, and I'll highlight it for the modularity team's > attention. Thanks. I also filed https://pagure.io/fm-orchestrator/issue/1629 a while back. I think this could help users understand MBS a bit better. - Ken

Re: Modularity documentation [was Re: The future of Fedora Server...] Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change))

2020-12-10 Thread Petr Šabata
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:08 PM James Szinger wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:10:03 +0100 > Petr Šabata wrote: > > Disable the freeradius module; it only has a context for the default > > perl stream and is blocking the switch. > > Still no joy. By the way, my point here is not to get this

Re: Modularity documentation [was Re: The future of Fedora Server...] Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change))

2020-12-10 Thread James Szinger
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:10:03 +0100 Petr Šabata wrote: > Disable the freeradius module; it only has a context for the default > perl stream and is blocking the switch. Still no joy. By the way, my point here is not to get this working, but rather to demonstrate the complexity of modularity and

Re: Modularity documentation [was Re: The future of Fedora Server...] Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change))

2020-12-10 Thread Petr Šabata
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 9:55 PM James Szinger wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:18:24 -0500 > Matthew Miller wrote: > > > Is there a particular part of the documentation you're struggling > > with, or something specifically you find missing? I don't mean to be > > snarky, but I heard a lot of

Re: Modularity documentation [was Re: The future of Fedora Server...] Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change))

2020-12-10 Thread James Szinger
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:18:24 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: > Is there a particular part of the documentation you're struggling > with, or something specifically you find missing? I don't mean to be > snarky, but I heard a lot of this complaint at the last DevConf.cz, > and then when the things

Re: Modularity documentation [was Re: The future of Fedora Server...] Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change))

2020-12-10 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:36:39AM -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote: > We're still using "calc" in the examples, and "lorim ipsum", etc. LOL. That's because of me. And no, I don't. For one thing, calc upstream development has pretty much stopped rendering the example moot. Thanks for filing this, and

Re: Modularity documentation [was Re: The future of Fedora Server...] Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change))

2020-12-10 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 3:18 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:02:01AM -0700, James Szinger wrote: > > I find the modularity end-user documentation to be woefully > > inadequate, especially for developers. > > Is there a particular part of the documentation you're struggling

Re: Modularity documentation [was Re: The future of Fedora Server...] Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change))

2020-12-08 Thread James Szinger
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:18:24 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:02:01AM -0700, James Szinger wrote: > > I find the modularity end-user documentation to be woefully > > inadequate, especially for developers. > > Is there a particular part of the documentation you're

Modularity documentation [was Re: The future of Fedora Server...] Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change))

2020-12-08 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:02:01AM -0700, James Szinger wrote: > I find the modularity end-user documentation to be woefully > inadequate, especially for developers. Is there a particular part of the documentation you're struggling with, or something specifically you find missing? I don't mean to