On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:56:35 AM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 05. 20 16:46, Christopher wrote:
>
> > Interesting that the survey shows that the most common response was that
> > people use it "not at all" and the overall response was negative, but
> > the reaction to that is, "improve the
Daniel Mach wrote:
> Our goal (I speak for the people who *currently* work on Modularity
> project at Red Hat) is *not* pushing anyone to use Modularity. It's up
> to Fesco, SIGs, spin maintainers and individual package maintainers to
> make their choices.
But our point is that it should be up to
Christopher wrote:
> Interesting that the survey shows that the most common response was that
> people use it "not at all" and the overall response was negative, but the
> reaction to that is, "improve the docs" and "works as intended". Am I the
> only one who thinks that the people pushing
Dne 19. 05. 20 v 16:56 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 19. 05. 20 16:46, Christopher wrote:
Interesting that the survey shows that the most common response was
that people use it "not at all" and the overall response was negative,
but the reaction to that is, "improve the docs" and "works as
On 19. 05. 20 16:46, Christopher wrote:
Interesting that the survey shows that the most common response was that people
use it "not at all" and the overall response was negative, but the reaction to
that is, "improve the docs" and "works as intended". Am I the only one who
thinks that the
of your responses to the Modularity
> survey. You can find the results posted on the Fedora community blog[1].
>
> Thanks to all of you who filled the survey and provided detailed
> explanation of what works and what not.
>
>
> [1] https://
://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/modularity-survey-results/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
