Hi,
On 10/13/2013 11:36 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
Hi maintainers,
On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
(d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before
we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer
use it). It would go
On 10/14/2013 10:27 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
I'm in rpmfusion's fas, bz and devel-ml now, applied for cvs. [BTW:
self-signed cert on fas makes me feel a bit uneasy.]
Thanks Michael (and Kevin, who replied off-list, too).
Every current (co-)maintainer but Martin have an RPM Fusion account
Xavier Bachelot venit, vidit, dixit 13.10.2013 11:36:
Hi maintainers,
On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
(d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was,
before
we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer
use it). It
Hi maintainers,
On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
(d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before
we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer
use it). It would go to the Free section, of course.
My proposal is to go
Hi Kevin,
On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
In Kaffeine's case, upstream is switching from xine-lib to MPlayer in their git
repository, so it will likely have to move to RPM Fusion sooner or later
anyway.
I took a look at kaffeine as found in F19 yesterday, and it is still
using
Hi,
On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
The following packages currently depend on xine-lib:
* gxine
* (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected)
* kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in the first place)
* oxine
* xine-plugin
* xine-ui
These packages would have
Xavier Bachelot venit, vidit, dixit 10.07.2013 10:58:
Hi,
On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
The following packages currently depend on xine-lib:
* gxine
* (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected)
* kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in the first
On 07/10/2013 11:57 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Xavier Bachelot venit, vidit, dixit 10.07.2013 10:58:
Hi,
On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
The following packages currently depend on xine-lib:
* gxine
* (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected)
* kaffeine (my package, the
Do you top-post on rpmfusion-developers? I'm sorry if I messed that up,
I'm not on that list and don't know the policy.
We were talking about restructuring the xine packages, and xine-ui was
supposed to be subsumed by another package if I remember correctly.
Do we move first than repackage?
In
On 07/10/2013 01:42 PM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Do you top-post on rpmfusion-developers? I'm sorry if I messed that up,
I'm not on that list and don't know the policy.
As on most lists, no, we don't top post, but no worries ;-)
We were talking about restructuring the xine packages, and
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:58:22 +0200
Xavier Bachelot wrote:
Hi,
On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
The following packages currently depend on xine-lib:
* gxine
* (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected)
* kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in
Hi,
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 at 10:51:44, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
I took a look at kaffeine as found in F19 yesterday, and it is still
using xine-lib (and does rebuild fine against the xine-lib 1.2.3 rpm I
prepared). A quick glance at upstream sources showed there are now an
mplayer and vlc
On 01/05/2012 09:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Thursday 05 January 2012, Michael J Gruber wrote:
I don't know anything about rpmfusion packaging and infrastructure, so
I'd be happy if someone picks up xine-ui there. In fact, xine-ui gets
most xine related abrt reports, it seems, and I always
Hi,
the current xine-lib maintainer speaking. :-)
The Xine project:
http://www.xine-project.org/home
has recently released a new major version, version 1.2.0.
Unfortunately, among the list of changes:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/xine/files/xine-lib/1.2.0/README.txt.asc/view
there are these
Kevin Kofler venit, vidit, dixit 05.01.2012 20:56:
Hi,
the current xine-lib maintainer speaking. :-)
The Xine project:
http://www.xine-project.org/home
has recently released a new major version, version 1.2.0.
Unfortunately, among the list of changes:
On Thursday 05 January 2012, Michael J Gruber wrote:
I don't know anything about rpmfusion packaging and infrastructure, so
I'd be happy if someone picks up xine-ui there. In fact, xine-ui gets
most xine related abrt reports, it seems, and I always found it
difficult to decide whether those
16 matches
Mail list logo