Re: Multiple identical udev rules -- safe?

2011-02-01 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > FWIW, I'd really like to see the console user have access to this by > default.  Then, uploading a file to the NXT brick would be plug and > play. Yeah. Trouble is - I know nothing about ConsoleKit policy. What's the trick to change this ud

Re: Multiple identical udev rules -- safe?

2011-02-01 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 11:04 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Am 31.01.2011 22:47, schrieb Martin Langhoff: > > Consider this file from nxt_python package: > > > > cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-lego.rules > > BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", GROUP="lego", MODE="0660" > > > > Is it safe & sane to i

Re: Multiple identical udev rules -- safe?

2011-02-01 Thread Harald Hoyer
Am 31.01.2011 22:47, schrieb Martin Langhoff: > Consider this file from nxt_python package: > > cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-lego.rules > BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", GROUP="lego", MODE="0660" > > Is it safe & sane to include an identical udev rule file in the nbc > package with differen

Multiple identical udev rules -- safe?

2011-01-31 Thread Martin Langhoff
Consider this file from nxt_python package: cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-lego.rules BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", GROUP="lego", MODE="0660" Is it safe & sane to include an identical udev rule file in the nbc package with different filename? To state the obvious -- it'd use the same group