Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-02-01 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "RC" == Remi Collet writes: RC> Please, don't change any of my packages. Could you perhaps explain your definition of "my" in that sentence? I'm kind of curious as to why someone might think that any package is the distribution is "theirs" as opposed to

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-02-01 Thread Petr Šabata
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:30:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:36:24PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix (steve, psabata) > > perl-Algorithm-IncludeExclude

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-29 Thread Richard Shaw
pysdm and gresistor fixed in master, no rebuild. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:36:24PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix (steve, psabata) > perl-Algorithm-IncludeExclude (iarnell, psabata) > perl-Algorithm-Merge (iarnell, psabata) > perl-Authen-PAM (steve,

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-29 Thread Remi Collet
Le 25/01/2016 23:34, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : > The %defattr statement in the %files section of a spec is used to > specify the default mode and user/group for the files and directories > which follow. I don't plan to change any of my spec files before March 2017, with other EL-5 stuff.

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-29 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix (steve, psabata) perl-Algorithm-IncludeExclude (iarnell, psabata) perl-Algorithm-Merge (iarnell, psabata) perl-Authen-PAM (steve, psabata) perl-Carp-Clan-Share (iarnell, psabata) perl-Class-Container

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/29/2016 03:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:36:24PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix (steve, psabata) perl-Algorithm-IncludeExclude (iarnell, psabata)

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:56:03 +0100 Remi Collet wrote: > Le 25/01/2016 23:34, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : > > The %defattr statement in the %files section of a spec is used to > > specify the default mode and user/group for the files and > > directories which follow.

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:32:50AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 01/27/2016 01:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >>On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM,

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/27/2016 09:37 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 12:51, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Hi, Ralf. On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Susi Lehtola
On 01/26/2016 12:48 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: This can bring bugs because, as noted in the orignal message, some people use to change wrong permissions coming from %install section. Can you give a concrete example where

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/27/2016 01:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Hi, Ralf. On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:32:50AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/27/2016 01:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >>>Hi, Ralf. > >>> > >>>On Wednesday, 27

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 12:51, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >Hi, Ralf. > > > >On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> > >>>fakeroot (athimm,

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "RC" == Ralf Corsepius writes: RC> Are you sure the owners list you used is current? I pulled them directly from pkgdb at the time I generated the list. There's no way that they could have been any more current when I sent the mail. - J< -- devel mailing list

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/27/2016 10:13 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "RC" == Ralf Corsepius writes: RC> Are you sure the owners list you used is current? I pulled them directly from pkgdb at the time I generated the list. There's no way that they could have been any more current when I

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2016-01-26, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "VS" == Ville Skyttä writes: >VS> The original post's general case is the one immediately after >VS> %files, that's what was grepped according to the poster. > > Yes, I limited the search to %defattr

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >Hi, Ralf. > > > >On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> > >>>fakeroot (athimm,

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Hi, Ralf. On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: fakeroot (athimm, rathann, corsepiu, moceap) Are you sure the owners list you used is current? I stepped

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Paul Howarth
On 27/01/16 11:51, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: The list is correct according to PackageDB. I don't rememeber if anyone ever initiated the non-responsive packager process for athimm or chitlesh. I don't know if somebody filed one against

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hi, Ralf. On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > >fakeroot (athimm, rathann, corsepiu, moceap) > > Are you sure the owners list you used is current? I stepped down as > fakeroot maintainer and removed myself many

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: fakeroot (athimm, rathann, corsepiu, moceap) Are you sure the owners list you used is current? I stepped down as fakeroot maintainer and removed myself many months ago. Also, I noticed a number of maintainers on your list, whose accounts

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > gtkglarea2 (rjones, rathann) Done + a few other spec file cleanups. > ioport (rjones) Done. > nekovm (rjones, andyli) Done. > ocaml-autoconf (rjones) > ocaml-camomile (rjones) > ocaml-p3l (rjones) All done. >

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:48:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > This can bring bugs because, as noted in the orignal message, some > > people use to change wrong permissions coming from %install section. > > Can you give a

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-26 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:48:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: >> > This can bring bugs because, as noted in the orignal message, some >> > people

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-26 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > This can bring bugs because, as noted in the orignal message, some > people use to change wrong permissions coming from %install section. Can you give a concrete example where doing this actually accomplishes something with

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 25/01/16 16:34 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: boost (pmachata, denisarnaud, jwakely) pstreams-devel (hubbitus, jwakely) Fixed in rawhide, not rebuilt. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-26 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "VS" == Ville Skyttä writes: VS> The original post's general case is the one immediately after VS> %files, that's what was grepped according to the poster. Yes, I limited the search to %defattr falling immediately after %files and setting a default value. I'm sure

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-25 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:34 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > beanstalkd (jjh, gnat) removed defattr. --  Nathanael -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-25 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2016-01-25, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> A huge list of packages and owners follows. Please consider cleaning up >> your packages if you can. (Yes, I have some on the list, which >> I've fixed

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > A huge list of packages and owners follows. Please consider cleaning up > your packages if you can. (Yes, I have some on the list, which > I've fixed already.) Packagers with no owners listed might have been > orphaned or

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:16:13PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > > ZJ> Better to just run a script to fix those overnight, and than deal > ZJ> with any fallout. > > Sure, I could, but I figured it's at least worth

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

2016-01-25 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: ZJ> Better to just run a script to fix those overnight, and than deal ZJ> with any fallout. Sure, I could, but I figured it's at least worth informing people. Maybe there's some use case for this of which I'm not aware. Or