On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 18:50 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 10:39, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
>
> > > Try enabling it via "systemctl enable NetworkManager.service"
> > >
> > > Not sure what went wrong here, but normally this fragment in
> > > Networkmanager.
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:04:41AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > Hmm, is it even enabled? Try "systemctl is-enabled NetworkManager.service
> > > ; echo $?" ?
> > # systemctl is-enabled NetworkManager.service ; echo $?
> > 1
> So, it isn't enabled. A zero exit code means it
On Tue, 08.02.11 17:21, Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 21:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 02/08/2011 09:09 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > >
> > > Why not fix it? That is, why should a user of this app care whether a
> > > service is SysV or systemd?
On Tue, 08.02.11 21:26, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On 02/08/2011 09:09 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> >
> > Why not fix it? That is, why should a user of this app care whether a
> > service is SysV or systemd? Or, is this app being replaced by some
> > other UI?
>
> Also is t
On Tue, 08.02.11 10:39, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
> > Try enabling it via "systemctl enable NetworkManager.service"
> >
> > Not sure what went wrong here, but normally this fragment in
> > Networkmanager.spec should ensure that the systemd service gets enabled
> > on upgrades
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 21:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 02/08/2011 09:09 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> >
> > Why not fix it? That is, why should a user of this app care whether a
> > service is SysV or systemd? Or, is this app being replaced by some
> > other UI?
>
> Also is there a plan to
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:27 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 05:18, Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:04 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Tue, 08.02.11 04:44, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm n
On 02/08/2011 09:09 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>
> Why not fix it? That is, why should a user of this app care whether a
> service is SysV or systemd? Or, is this app being replaced by some
> other UI?
Also is there a plan to modify chkconfig in a similar way to service so
that it calls systemct
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:04 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 04:44, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
>
> > > > > what does "systemctl status NetworkManager.service" say?
> > > >
> > > > After booting and logging in as root:
> > > >
> > > > # systemctl sta
On Tue, 08.02.11 05:18, Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:04 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 08.02.11 04:44, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
>
> > > I'm not sure whether "1" means it is or it isn't; but
> > > system-config-servic
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:04 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 04:44, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
> > I'm not sure whether "1" means it is or it isn't; but
> > system-config-services claims it's enabled.
>
> s-c-s only covers sysv services. We probably should de
On Tue, 08.02.11 04:44, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
> > > > what does "systemctl status NetworkManager.service" say?
> > >
> > > After booting and logging in as root:
> > >
> > > # systemctl status NetworkManager.service
> > > NetworkManager.service - Network Ma
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 09:16 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 04.02.11 13:31, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 21:12 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mon, 31.01.11 02:22, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Fri, 04.02.11 13:31, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 21:12 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 31.01.11 02:22, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
> >
> > > I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> >
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 21:12 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 31.01.11 02:22, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
>
> > I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> > that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
> > manua
On 01/31/2011 08:22 AM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
> manually. As far as I can tell, it is configured to start on boot. Is
> there something about the v
On Mon, 31.01.11 02:22, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
> manually. As far as I can tell, it is configured to start on boot. Is
> the
On 2/1/11 6:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 02/01/2011 05:05 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> On 1/31/11 4:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
>>> There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting
>>> (I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
>>>
>>> I would assume its th
On 2/3/11 1:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 02:22 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
>> that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
>> manually. As far as I can tell, it is configu
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 02:22 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
> manually. As far as I can tell, it is configured to start on boot. Is
> there something
NetworkManager doesn't start with selinux in permissive mode. The
problem is somewhere else
2011/2/2 Chris Jones :
> Agreed with others, I can't see Network Manager having issue with SELinux.
>
> Can you post SELinux reporting details?
>
> --
> Chris Jones
>
> PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic -
Agreed with others, I can't see Network Manager having issue with SELinux.
Can you post SELinux reporting details?
--
Chris Jones
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
C and L Jones - Proprietors
ABN: 98 317 740 240
WWW: http://photoresolutions.freehostia.com
@: chrisjo...@comcen.com.au or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/2011 05:05 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On 1/31/11 4:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
>> There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting
>> (I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
>>
>> I would assume its the
On 1/31/11 4:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
> There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting
> (I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
>
> I would assume its the same error?
So far, I have not identified an SELinux denial that appears to be
associated with th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/2011 04:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
> There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting
> (I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
>
> I would assume its the same error?
>
> On 31 January 2011 07:22, Brad
There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting (I
upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
I would assume its the same error?
On 31 January 2011 07:22, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> that Ne
I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
manually. As far as I can tell, it is configured to start on boot. Is
there something about the virtual machine context that would trigger
this?
--
Br
27 matches
Mail list logo
