Re: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package

2013-12-07 Thread Jochen Schmitt
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 09:56:47AM -0500, Will Benton wrote: > Sorry for any confusion, Jochen. The next step in the process is notifying > fedora-devel, which it appears we're doing now. > > Jochen, would your preferred resolution be to be the primary maintainer (with > one or more co-maintain

Re: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package

2013-12-07 Thread Will Benton
ochen Schmitt" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2013 6:32:01 AM > Subject: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package > > Hello, > > We have an open bug [1] becouse the primary mantainer of the scala > package shows no respo

None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package

2013-12-07 Thread Jochen Schmitt
Hello, We have an open bug [1] becouse the primary mantainer of the scala package shows no response for open bugs. Unfortunately, the original bug reporter seems to lost the inerest to finish the none-responsive maintainer process. So I would like to ask, if it ok to reassign the bug to myself w