Re: Now Publishing fedora developer PGP keys in DNSSEC

2015-02-17 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:10:13PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: I could put them under fedor...@fedoraproject.org ? Please use fedora-xx-primary and fedora-xx-secondary, these are now used starting with Fedora 23. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Now Publishing fedora developer PGP keys in DNSSEC

2015-02-01 Thread Björn Persson
Paul Wouters wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Till Maas wrote: | 5) almost all these keys are old keys of which I could forge a fake | matching keyid and upload it to public key servers. Can you explain this? For which keys is this not possiblea

Re: Now Publishing fedora developer PGP keys in DNSSEC

2015-01-28 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Till Maas wrote: The keyid is part of the fingerprint, so with the fingerprint one can download the key and verify it. Therefore it is the only right thing to do. I'm not saying don't store the fingerprint, but use a separate field for that which is not the keyid field.

Re: Now Publishing fedora developer PGP keys in DNSSEC

2015-01-28 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:10:13PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Till Maas wrote: The keyid is part of the fingerprint, so with the fingerprint one can download the key and verify it. Therefore it is the only right thing to do. I'm not saying don't store the fingerprint,