Re: Packages optimized for very specific x86_64 "x" generation (OpenSUSE OBS / Fedora Koji)

2018-04-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 13 April 2018 at 09:47, Germano Massullo wrote: > As darktable co-maintainer, today I was speaking with darix from > OpenSUSE community, which maintains such package on that distro. > On their OBS build system, they are able to build various packages each > one

Re: Packages optimized for very specific x86_64 "x" generation (OpenSUSE OBS / Fedora Koji)

2018-04-13 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 13 April 2018 at 15:47, Germano Massullo wrote: > As darktable co-maintainer, today I was speaking with darix from > OpenSUSE community, which maintains such package on that distro. > On their OBS build system, they are able to build various packages each > one optimized for a single

Packages optimized for very specific x86_64 "x" generation (OpenSUSE OBS / Fedora Koji)

2018-04-13 Thread Germano Massullo
As darktable co-maintainer, today I was speaking with darix from OpenSUSE community, which maintains such package on that distro. On their OBS build system, they are able to build various packages each one optimized for a single x86_64 CPU generation using @BUILD_FLAVOR@ + _multibuild file.[1] So

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-29 Thread Damian Ivanov
Thanks for the feedback guys. Of course I do Fedora and SuSE on my PC. But from Mo-Fr. I am not at home and use my companie's laptop where I can not install Linux and wouldn't really like to install additional software. And having two laptops around would be too much :) How can I package Fedora

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/29/2012 10:17 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote: Thanks for the feedback guys. Of course I do Fedora and SuSE on my PC. But from Mo-Fr. I am not at home and use my companie's laptop where I can not install Linux and wouldn't really like to install additional software. And having two laptops

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-29 Thread Björn Persson
Damian Ivanov wrote: Of course I do Fedora and SuSE on my PC. But from Mo-Fr. I am not at home and use my companie's laptop where I can not install Linux and wouldn't really like to install additional software. And having two laptops around would be too much :) Are you not even allowed to

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-29 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 12:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: He seems to be talking about a web interface that lets you edit specs and submit builds - some kind of basic text editor webapp hooked up to the spec repository, I guess. If you really need this, and don't have any basic

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-29 Thread Dodji Seketeli
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com a écrit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers This is really nice. I wasn't aware people could have access to remote Rawhide machines for testing purposes. I guess it won't be really useful for maintainers of packages

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-29 Thread Damian Ivanov
Yeah nice to see such things are available. Using ssh to my own machine is not acceptable for me. This would mean a higher bill for energy :) Well I think I will stick to OBS as it is now, may the other maintainer Xiao-Long wants to get the packages into main Fedora. OBS perfectly suites my

OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Damian Ivanov
Hello all, Any chance Fedora moves from Koji to OBS? Why should they? OBS has a web interface so one can easily fix packages even from an internet cafe/work/windows pc. Projects can be developed separately and packages can be easily branched and submitted. openSUSE is entirely build by OBS.

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Damian Ivanov damianator...@gmail.com wrote: What would stop Fedora from doing this switch? First, I'll completely ignore the question of what's wrong with what we have now. Second, speaking as one who tried to port OBS to a RHEL platform once [1]: because of

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Damian Ivanov
First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am one of the maintainers of the experimental unity for Fedora and I do a few

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/28/2012 09:53 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote: First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am one of the maintainers of

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Michael Scherer
Le samedi 28 juillet 2012 à 19:23 +0300, Damian Ivanov a écrit : First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ Yes, but that doesn't mean this is sustainable. from my experience, the

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Damian Ivanov damianator...@gmail.com wrote: First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface.

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread devzero2000
Sorry for the top posting. Just my 1 cent , i follow only fedora. But the answer could be only: political in first place. But this is the same for every distro, and this is true, in particular, for every distro rpm based for some reason. Every major rpm distro have its buildsystem, its

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 19:23 +0300, Damian Ivanov wrote: First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am one of the

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 17:50 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Damian Ivanov damianator...@gmail.com wrote: First Thanks for the link and the answer. The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Jef Spaleta
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: He seems to be talking about a web interface that lets you edit specs and submit builds - some kind of basic text editor webapp hooked up to the spec repository, I guess. I don't know if we need a webapp. But some

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/28/2012 09:33 PM, devzero2000 wrote: why don't use lauchpad instead ? Because it use bazar as dvcs ? Really ? But no. Launchpad is not a build system. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: OBS Fedora

2012-07-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/28/2012 09:33 PM, devzero2000 wrote: why don't use lauchpad instead ? Because it use bazar as dvcs ? Really ? But no. Launchpad is not a build system. Well, no, not now, but once it becomes self-aware, who