On Sun, 2016-08-28 at 08:54 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Only option 2 has the non-military restriction, and anything in Fedora would
> > almost certainly fall under 1 or 3. So, I can't imagine there'd be a problem
> > using the OCB patent in Fedora software. I'm actually not even sure why
> >
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Christopher wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 6:16 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have some questions about OCB[0] and it's usage in Fedora.
>>
>> I wanted to package pycryptodome[1] and found that they
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 6:16 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some questions about OCB[0] and it's usage in Fedora.
>
> I wanted to package pycryptodome[1] and found that they implement OCB
> in their code. From my POV (completely without any legal knowledge) it
>
Hi,
I have some questions about OCB[0] and it's usage in Fedora.
I wanted to package pycryptodome[1] and found that they implement OCB
in their code. From my POV (completely without any legal knowledge) it
seems that it's not completely free[2] as it's not allowed for
military use. It seems to