On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 11:16 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
...
> So, as we all know, build ordering is hard (and, despite intuitive
> belief, not actually deterministic).
>
> ELN actually "cheats" somewhat when we do our builds. When we process
> a batch of builds (triggered by a set of tag events t
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 15:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:16:17AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > So, as we all know, build ordering is hard (and, despite intuitive
> > belief, not actually deterministic).
> >
> > ELN actually "cheats" somewhat when we do our builds.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 3:45 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:16:17AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > So, as we all know, build ordering is hard (and, despite intuitive
> > belief, not actually deterministic).
> >
> > ELN actually "cheats" somewhat when we do our build
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:16:17AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> So, as we all know, build ordering is hard (and, despite intuitive
> belief, not actually deterministic).
>
> ELN actually "cheats" somewhat when we do our builds. When we process
> a batch of builds (triggered by a set of tag ev
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 7:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:19:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 0
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 07:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:19:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 05,
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:19:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > Over t
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:19:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Over the next few days I'm going to rebuild all OCaml packages in
> > > Rawhide for
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:48:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Over the next few days I'm going to rebuild all OCaml packages in
> > Rawhide for OCaml 5.1, plus some non-OCaml packages that have OCaml
> > bindings.
> >
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Over the next few days I'm going to rebuild all OCaml packages in
> Rawhide for OCaml 5.1, plus some non-OCaml packages that have OCaml
> bindings.
>
> OCaml 5.1 is basically a small point release, but it does add back
> native
Over the next few days I'm going to rebuild all OCaml packages in
Rawhide for OCaml 5.1, plus some non-OCaml packages that have OCaml
bindings.
OCaml 5.1 is basically a small point release, but it does add back
native code support for riscv64 and s390x. The only remaining
architecture that hasn't
11 matches
Mail list logo