On 26 August 2011 19:50, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
> On 08/26/2011 12:13 PM, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
>> 3. cp-dev seems to not only use Black Box to bootstrap, but it also
>> seems to use Black Box sources as a part of itself. I have not yet
>> investigated whether this is true and, if true, how th
On 08/26/2011 12:13 PM, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
> 3. cp-dev seems to not only use Black Box to bootstrap, but it also
> seems to use Black Box sources as a part of itself. I have not yet
> investigated whether this is true and, if true, how the relevant sources
> are licensed.
BlackBox Component
On 06/14/2011 07:41 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> PS:
>
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> I was wondering if there could be an exception here, since the code is
>> actually available and open.
>
> Have you even looked at that "source code"? I just have:
>
> 1. They refer to the Window$ download for the code.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:34:46AM -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> In this case, the most obvious candidates would probably be
> >> FreePascal/Lazarus and GPC, but porting to a completely different, more
> >> commonly u
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> In this case, the most obvious candidates would probably be
>> FreePascal/Lazarus and GPC, but porting to a completely different, more
>> commonly used language (I'd suggest C++) might also be worth considering
>> for up
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> In this case, the most obvious candidates would probably be
> FreePascal/Lazarus and GPC, but porting to a completely different, more
> commonly used language (I'd suggest C++) might also be worth considering
> for upstream (depending on how hard it is to port to a Free Pascal
PS:
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I was wondering if there could be an exception here, since the code is
> actually available and open.
Have you even looked at that "source code"? I just have:
1. They refer to the Window$ download for the code. That's a .EXE file
created with some proprietary installer
Paul Johnson wrote:
> First, the (now open) code for OpenBugs is written in Object Pascal
> and it requires a compiler framework called "Black Box" which is, as
> far as I can understand, available only for MS Windows. The OpenBUGS
> team compiles that library, and then for linux we use some acces
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 10:54 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > I decided to try to help the cause of Bayesian statistics and the open
> > source effort of the OpenBUGS group (http://www.openbugs.info/w/) by
> > making some packages. In case you are not a statistically-inclined
> > person, it is worth kn
> I decided to try to help the cause of Bayesian statistics and the open
> source effort of the OpenBUGS group (http://www.openbugs.info/w/) by
> making some packages. In case you are not a statistically-inclined
> person, it is worth knowing that Bayesian Updating with Gibbs Sampling
> (BUGS) ha
I decided to try to help the cause of Bayesian statistics and the open
source effort of the OpenBUGS group (http://www.openbugs.info/w/) by
making some packages. In case you are not a statistically-inclined
person, it is worth knowing that Bayesian Updating with Gibbs Sampling
(BUGS) has caused so
11 matches
Mail list logo
