I have orphaned js-jquery-file-upload.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Would anybody like to maintain js-jquery-file-upload? If not, I will
orphan it.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/js-jquery-file-upload
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:12:48 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 4/26/19 8:53 AM, stan wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:07:54 - (UTC)
> > Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > I am a fedora user with no dog in this fight.
> >
> >> Controversial property of modules are private build-time
> >> dependencie
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:19:06 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> The restrictions by Fedora Koji prevent that, but yes, MBS and
> Modularity do allow for something like this. It can't happen in Fedora
> because our Koji is not set up to consume external repositories
> (except for EPEL, which consumes RHEL
On 4/26/19 8:53 AM, stan wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:07:54 - (UTC)
> Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> I am a fedora user with no dog in this fight.
>
>> Controversial property of modules are private build-time dependencies.
>> Modularity allows packagers to hide them and to not to support them
>>
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 11:20 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:53 AM stan wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:07:54 - (UTC)
> > Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > I am a fedora user with no dog in this fight.
> >
> > > Controversial property of modules are private build-time depe
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:53 AM stan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:07:54 - (UTC)
> Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> I am a fedora user with no dog in this fight.
>
> > Controversial property of modules are private build-time dependencies.
> > Modularity allows packagers to hide them and to not to s
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:07:54 - (UTC)
Petr Pisar wrote:
I am a fedora user with no dog in this fight.
> Controversial property of modules are private build-time dependencies.
> Modularity allows packagers to hide them and to not to support them
> (to the extend that they work in my module).
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 8:25 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> There was the packager UX initiative draft [2] proposed in December 2018,
> however it seems nobody really is eager to go and start doing this.
> It seems that this is a bit too much for volunteers and Red Hat paid Fedora
> contributors are alr
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 3:23 PM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 25 avril 2019 à 20:00 -0400, Christopher a écrit :
> > Fighting with the "Modularity team", whoever they are
> > (a SIG? a mailing list?, a team at RedHat? ... I don't really know
> > who they are)
>
> Just to be clear: this is no
Le jeudi 25 avril 2019 à 20:00 -0400, Christopher a écrit :
> Fighting with the "Modularity team", whoever they are
> (a SIG? a mailing list?, a team at RedHat? ... I don't really know
> who they are)
Just to be clear: this is not about fighting the Modularity team (or
any other team, for that ma
On 2019-04-26, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 04. 19 10:55, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> How does modularity make it easier though?
>>>
>>> It seems to me that it does the exact opposite - instead of having
>>> one version of each package to maintain I now have multiple versions
>>> to worry about! I mean
Dne 26. 04. 19 v 11:15 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 26. 04. 19 10:55, Vít Ondruch wrote:>> How does modularity make it
> easier though?
>>>
>>> It seems to me that it does the exact opposite - instead of having
>>> one version of each package to maintain I now have multiple versions
>>> to worry a
On 26. 04. 19 10:55, Vít Ondruch wrote:>> How does modularity make it easier
though?
It seems to me that it does the exact opposite - instead of having
one version of each package to maintain I now have multiple versions
to worry about! I mean obviously I could convert to a module and
only main
Dne 25. 04. 19 v 20:37 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
> On 25/04/2019 19:29, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 04:23, Nicolas Mailhot
>> mailto:nicolas.mail...@laposte.net>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 à 16:14 -0400, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
>> >
>>
On 26. 04. 19 2:00, Christopher wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:39 PM Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/04/2019 19:29, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 04:23, Nicolas Mailhot
mailto:nicolas.mail...@laposte.net>> wrote:
Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 à 16:14 -0400, Stephen Gallaghe
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 20:01, Christopher
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:39 PM Tom Hughes wrote:
> >
> > On 25/04/2019 19:29, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 04:23, Nicolas Mailhot
> > > mailto:nicolas.mail...@laposte.net>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Le mer
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:39 PM Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> On 25/04/2019 19:29, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 04:23, Nicolas Mailhot
> > mailto:nicolas.mail...@laposte.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 à 16:14 -0400, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
> >
On 25/04/2019 19:29, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 04:23, Nicolas Mailhot
mailto:nicolas.mail...@laposte.net>> wrote:
Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 à 16:14 -0400, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
>
> FWIW, things should *not* be getting harder. Some folks just jumpe
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 04:23, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 à 16:14 -0400, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
> >
> > FWIW, things should *not* be getting harder. Some folks just jumped
> > the gun and made changes they weren't supposed to (yet) and now the
> > Modularity team has a
On 25. 04. 19 12:13, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> The reasons are the same as why I keep alive the other versions. I'm not
> really going to maintain it unless I am totally bored. Also, there are
> other dependencies which are going to be orphaned soon, so I might
> change my mind ...
I have claimed the d
Dne 24. 04. 19 v 21:31 Christopher napsal(a):
> I'm orphaning js-jquery, since I do not have time to maintain it.
I requested unorpahing js-jquery:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8308
The reasons are the same as why I keep alive the other versions. I'm not
really going to maintai
Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 à 16:14 -0400, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
>
> FWIW, things should *not* be getting harder. Some folks just jumped
> the gun and made changes they weren't supposed to (yet) and now the
> Modularity team has a lot of fires to put out and very few resources
> with which to
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:15 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:33 PM Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm orphaning js-jquery, since I do not have time to maintain it.
> >
> > It's getting harder to contribute to Fedora with all th
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:33 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> I'm orphaning js-jquery, since I do not have time to maintain it.
>
> It's getting harder to contribute to Fedora with all the mass
> orphaning of dependencies, and I don't have time to figure it all out.
>
I'm orphaning js-jquery, since I do not have time to maintain it.
It's getting harder to contribute to Fedora with all the mass
orphaning of dependencies, and I don't have time to figure it all out.
This is one that needs frequent attention, as jQuery is subject to
lots of vulne
26 matches
Mail list logo
