Richard Hughes wrote:
> Actually, I was going to propose doing "gsettings set
> org.gnome.software require-appdata true"
That's at least the right place to enforce that policy.
> I guess you'll have to apologise for that tirade, right?
So yes, sorry for assuming otherwise.
That still doesn't me
On 9 November 2014 23:11, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I oppose this kind of censorship, especially because you are implementing it
> at the point of AppStream data generation, and thus your arbitrary policy
> decisions do not affect only the GNOME Software Center, but also any other
> consumer of the Ap
Richard Hughes wrote:
> It will come as no surprise to many of you, but I'm going to propose
> that we only show applications in the software center in F22 when they
> have an AppData file. At the moment nearly 50% of applications in
> Fedora 21 ship AppData files, and the ones left over are not ex
I will take care of the MATE packages and coordinate with upstream. I will
also deal with the following:
easystroke
qbittorrent
x11vnc
krename
avogadro
bkchem
chemtool
gausssum
IQmol
openbabel-gui
pybliographer
If someone has already contacted upstream or if you have created appdata
files about
2014-11-07 17:28 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes :
> Is it in a tarball that's been built for F22?
>
Version 2.7.2 was released in April and it doesn't have it, it's in their
development tree.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fed
On 7 November 2014 15:01, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> You can scratch nut-monitor off, it already has appdata:
Is it in a tarball that's been built for F22? What some upstreams do
is commit the file upstream but either forget to dist the file in the
tarball, or forget to install the file at ins
You can scratch nut-monitor off, it already has appdata:
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/master/scripts/python/app/nut-monitor.appdata.xml
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorapr
- Original Message -
> On 7 November 2014 11:24, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > This is a very good idea, if we want to enforce it, packaging guidelines
> > are good place to start with for new applications.
>
> Approved, but ignored: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/414
Based on the last
On 7 November 2014 11:24, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> This is a very good idea, if we want to enforce it, packaging guidelines
> are good place to start with for new applications.
Approved, but ignored: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/414
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On 7 November 2014 11:04, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> I read your blog posts on AppStream/AppData and I found some
> Workstation/AppDataImprovement pages on the wiki, but I could not find the
> list you provided in your original message.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-Nove
- Original Message -
> Hi all,
>
> It will come as no surprise to many of you, but I'm going to propose
> that we only show applications in the software center in F22 when they
> have an AppData file. At the moment nearly 50% of applications in
> Fedora 21 ship AppData files, and the ones
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 6 November 2014 14:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> Why wouldn't we (Fedora) add an AppData file to the package ourselves
> >> for such exceptions?
> >
> > We can, and should. I'd argue it's one of the most usef
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 6 November 2014 14:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Why wouldn't we (Fedora) add an AppData file to the package ourselves
>> for such exceptions?
>
> We can, and should. I'd argue it's one of the most useful thing a
> Fedora packager can do:
>
>
2014-11-06 12:03 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes :
> I've attached a list of all the applications that would be affected by
> this change. It's a long list, but a *lot* of the applications are
> kinda dubious (lshw-gui anyone?).
>
I read your blog posts on AppStream/AppData and I found some
Workstation/
On 7 November 2014 02:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> We would. My point is that we should we should make a list of
> applications which are not allowed to fall by the wayside
I think that list would be very different for each person you ask; the
easiest thing to do is to just create the
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:49:15AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > So, I think your proposal should be amended with the a list kept
> > somewhere on a wiki of applications which must get appdata, and treat
> > this list as blocking for this feature. This list would include
> > applications that are "w
On 6 November 2014 19:25, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> So, should we contact upstream about the appdata file requirement and if
> that doesn't work out make our own and send it to the package maintainer?
> Where should the screenshots go?
You can either put them on your fedorapeople page, or jus
So, should we contact upstream about the appdata file requirement and if
that doesn't work out make our own and send it to the package maintainer?
Where should the screenshots go?
I also agree with the proposal (even though this is the first time I read
about a software center), but your list cont
Hello,
first of all sorry if I missed this earlier, I can't hardly cope with all
mails received on devel. I tried to read them all when I can.
As the maintainer of these:
bacula-console-bat
> bacula-traymonitor
I would suggest them to be removed from the software center, they are far
from "bein
On 6 November 2014 11:52, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> This is very good software, which should be there.
> Quick google search shows this:
> https://github.com/ximion/kde-appstream-metadata-templates/blob/master/apps/amarok.appdata.xml
Yes, ximion has been slowly upstreaming those. It's not quite as
On 6 November 2014 14:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Why wouldn't we (Fedora) add an AppData file to the package ourselves
> for such exceptions?
We can, and should. I'd argue it's one of the most useful thing a
Fedora packager can do:
* Spend the 5 minutes writing the AppData file
* Spend 5 minutes ta
On 11/06/2014 11:03 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
amarok
This is very good software, which should be there.
Quick google search shows this:
https://github.com/ximion/kde-appstream-metadata-templates/blob/master/apps/amarok.appdata.xml
datovka
This one is good as well. I just sent appdata file t
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:03:08AM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It will come as no surprise to many of you, but I'm going to propose
>> that we only show applications in the software center in F22 when they
>> ha
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:03:08AM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It will come as no surprise to many of you, but I'm going to propose
> that we only show applications in the software center in F22 when they
> have an AppData file. At the moment nearly 50% of applications in
> Fedora 2
Hi all,
It will come as no surprise to many of you, but I'm going to propose
that we only show applications in the software center in F22 when they
have an AppData file. At the moment nearly 50% of applications in
Fedora 21 ship AppData files, and the ones left over are not exactly
the award winni
25 matches
Mail list logo
