I logged an issue about this for the Package Maintainer Docs [1].
Similarly to all other other issues in that list,
I intend to do something about this at some point,
unless somebody else beats me to it.
[1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/issue/33
Otto
Miro Hrončok kirjo
> section "Chained builds". What about those, what are they useful for?
Chained builds are mostly useful when you have a package B which depends on
package A.
Instead of building package A, waiting for a confirmation that the build
completed
and made it to the buildroot, and then manually launchi
Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 24.9.2021 klo 11.13:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages
Shouldn't it be somehow aligned with this ^^ chapter? Maybe the chapter
should be referenced at least, because it explains how to request the
side tag.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages
Shouldn't it be somehow aligned with this ^^ chapter? Maybe the chapter
should be referenced at least, because it explains how to request the
side tag.
Vít
Dne 23. 09. 21 v 11:29 Miro Hrončok n
On 23. 09. 21 17:28, Adam Williamson wrote:
... (in
fact, we could have a discussion about getting rid of buildroot
overrides, at this point).
Buildroot overrides still have their use cases. E.g. when there is an existing
update stuck at testing (e.g. during a freeze) that is needed to allow b
On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 11:29 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#updating_inter_dependent_packages
>
> Says:
>
> """
> You may need a buildroot override to complete a multi-package update
> successfully. For instance in the c
tor 2021-09-23 klockan 11:29 +0200 skrev Miro Hrončok:
>
> However, I think side-tags should be the preferred solution, as their
> impact is
> isolated. Buildroot overrides create temporary broken dependencies
> for
> everybody, while side-tags don't.
For stable releases I think I agree, even w
V Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:04:36PM +0200, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 23. 09. 21 11:48, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> > Sounds good. I took a look at the "multi builds" page - it describes the
> > process neatly, but I think there's one thing that could be added there:
> > what if you already buil
On 23. 09. 21 11:48, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
Sounds good. I took a look at the "multi builds" page - it describes the
process neatly,
but I think there's one thing that could be added there: what if you already
built a package
in the main tag (but it didn't go through bodhi and get to stab
Sounds good. I took a look at the "multi builds" page - it describes the
process neatly,
but I think there's one thing that could be added there: what if you already
built a package
in the main tag (but it didn't go through bodhi and get to stable)? Will it be
included in the
newly-created side
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#updating_inter_dependent_packages
Says:
"""
You may need a buildroot override to complete a multi-package update
successfully. For instance in the case described above, you may need to rebuild
bar against the new li
11 matches
Mail list logo
