Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-22 Thread Ron Olson
I’m trying to correlate the two; the first was a warning when using Swift, and it was on both intel and aarch64, while in this new situation it can’t even build Swift properly without the crash. :\ On 22 Sep 2023, at 7:02, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:39:21PM +0100,

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:39:21PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I am doing a build locally myself to see if it is reproducible. It is indeed reproducible (albeit the build took ~ 24 hours). I have a coredump and stack trace if that's helpful? Peter mentioned this bug which does seem to be

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 3:25 PM Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all- > > I was trying to submit the released version of Swift 5.9 to Fedora but I get > a build failure only for the aarch64 platform for Rawhide and F39: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291751 (F39) >

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Ron Olson
Right, I was leaning in that direction regardless, if only because it means keeping track of what-has-what easier. :) On 21 Sep 2023, at 9:56, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 09:24 -0500, Ron Olson wrote: Could I, possibly, temporarily drop support for aarch64 in the spec file

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Ron Olson
> Are upstream responsive to issues in general, and in particular this > case which is not the current version? I mean to say, do you think > they'd provide a fix very quickly if you asked them to look at it? > Sorry for the confusion, 5.9 is the current version, it was released on Monday; I

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 09:24 -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > The funny thing is that Apple has already started providing development > versions of Swift 5.10 and it does, in fact, build on both x86_64 and aarch64. This seems like it presents an opportunity. If this were me, I would look into the

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 09:24 -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > Could I, possibly, temporarily drop support for aarch64 in the spec file for > 5.9 so all versions of x86_64 can get it, and then re-enable it for if/when I > figure out what’s going on with the aarch64 version? Please don't do this. It's

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 10:24, Ron Olson wrote: > Hey all- > > I was trying to submit the released version of Swift 5.9 to Fedora but I > get a build failure only for the aarch64 platform for Rawhide and F39: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291751 (F39) >

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 09:24:26AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > Hey all- > > I was trying to submit the released version of Swift 5.9 to Fedora but I get > a build failure only for the aarch64 platform for Rawhide and F39: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291751 (F39) >

Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Ron Olson
Hey all- I was trying to submit the released version of Swift 5.9 to Fedora but I get a build failure only for the aarch64 platform for Rawhide and F39: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291751 (F39) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291750