Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec file
or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master branch.
Is this desired? Here is the list:
askbot-plugin-authfas
autoconf268
bwping
Django14
drupal7-honeypot
drupal7-xmlsitemap
fetch-crl3
gnuplot44
Viktor Jancik wrote:
> Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec
> file or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master
> branch.
At least some of these are epel-only packages (examples below)
dead.package I thought was only applicable to packa
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:48:44 -0400 (EDT), Viktor Jancik wrote:
> Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec
> file or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master branch.
>
> Is this desired? Here is the list:
[...]
> I came to the conclusion,
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:02:41 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> dead.package I thought was only applicable to packages that existed in
> fedora, then were EOL'd. Should that case be handled differently?
It prevents new branches from being created.
Will there be more empty branches in the future, if th
Rex Dieter wrote:
> At least some of these are epel-only packages (examples below)
>
> dead.package I thought was only applicable to packages that existed in
> fedora, then were EOL'd. Should that case be handled differently?
EPEL-only packages should have their devel branch (and any other Fedor
Hi
On 08/21/2015 07:48 PM, Viktor Jancik wrote:
Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec file
or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master branch.
Is this desired? Here is the list:
askbot-plugin-authfas
autoconf268
bwping
Django14
drupal
Dne 21.8.2015 v 19:48 Viktor Jancik napsal(a):
> Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec
> file or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master branch.
>
> Is this desired? Here is the list:
>
>
> rubygem-amq-protocol
This was never imported.
Dne 21.8.2015 v 19:48 Viktor Jancik napsal(a):
> Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec
> file or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master branch.
>
> Is this desired? Here is the list:
>
>
> rubygem-amq-protocol
Package was probably never
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:45:30PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> EPEL-only packages should have their devel branch (and any other Fedora
> branches if they were already created) properly retired including adding the
> dead.package file. It can say something like "EPEL-only package."
EPEL-only pa
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:45:30PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> EPEL-only packages should have their devel branch (and any other Fedora
>> branches if they were already created) properly retired including adding the
>> dead.package file. It c
10 matches
Mail list logo