Ah, thanks. Indeed. It's a bit old, but nice… :) Thanks for packaging it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Aha, so the discussion is about the "(not so) free" level packs already. Did
not know that, indeed. If so, everything is all right. And in any case, you can
still package it without these level packs. :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
Oh, nice. In this case I'll take everything back…
I just got the impression, because of the prices list on the main website
(https://askbot.com/plans/) and on askbot.com I did not find a link to the repo…
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:11 PM, rugk wrote:
> FYI, the game's name I could not remember was "Which way is up". See
> https://packages.debian.org/stretch/whichwayisup.
>
Nice game. I didn't know it.
I packaged it and it's available for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=146477
I think you're misunderstanding the discussion; the issue is not whether it's
okay to package the game at all - as noted by Matthew and Zbigniew, being able
to use copyrighted levels and such is okay; see: Fedora packs Doom ports.
The current blocker is that the level packs (CCLPs) use a licence
> (Game engines which are open source and which work with redistributable but
> non-free content are a different special case.)
Actually that's the case here, as explained in another post. It does *not
require* the non-FLOSS binaries.
___
devel mailing
FYI, the game's name I could not remember was "Which way is up". See
https://packages.debian.org/stretch/whichwayisup.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Actually, BTW, one basic assumption you do is wrong: The game can be played
completely without the maybe-proprietary binary. There are FLOSS levels
inside/bundled IIRC.
Playing the original levels is just an "extra feature" and if you don't use it,
you don't use it.
Not allowing the software, b
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 07:47:48PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> On 06/17/2017 07:41 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> > On 06/17/2017 07:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:45:54AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >>> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> >>>
> Am 16.
On 06/17/2017 07:41 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> On 06/17/2017 07:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:45:54AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>>>
Am 16.06.2017 um 22:52 schrieb Artur Iwicki:
> I took a shot at packaging the ga
On 06/17/2017 07:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:45:54AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>>
>>> Am 16.06.2017 um 22:52 schrieb Artur Iwicki:
I took a shot at packaging the game and it went rather smoothly. The only
issue I h
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:45:54AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>
> > Am 16.06.2017 um 22:52 schrieb Artur Iwicki:
> >> I took a shot at packaging the game and it went rather smoothly. The only
> >> issue I have is that the level packs don't really have a licence; the
>
Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am 16.06.2017 um 22:52 schrieb Artur Iwicki:
>> I took a shot at packaging the game and it went rather smoothly. The only
>> issue I have is that the level packs don't really have a licence; the
>> only copyright info is a line at the end of the readme, stating: "Th
Artur Iwicki wrote:
> I took a shot at packaging the game and it went rather smoothly. The only
> issue I have is that the level packs don't really have a licence; the only
> copyright info is a line at the end of the readme, stating: "This package
> [...] may be distributed freely, as long as its
To anyone interested: I've finished packaging the game and would be grateful
for a review. I can do a review swap in exchange.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462412
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
Am 16.06.2017 um 22:52 schrieb Artur Iwicki:
I took a shot at packaging the game and it went rather smoothly. The only issue I have is
that the level packs don't really have a licence; the only copyright info is a line at
the end of the readme, stating: "This package [...] may be distributed fr
I took a shot at packaging the game and it went rather smoothly. The only issue
I have is that the level packs don't really have a licence; the only copyright
info is a line at the end of the readme, stating: "This package [...] may be
distributed freely, as long as its contents are left intact
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:18:13PM -, rugk wrote:
> > wonder what Legal's opinion on that would be.
>
> It worked in Debian. ;)
> Basically they did not package the original game files. I think they
> are even not included in the upstream project. They just state: "Do
> you have a file of th
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:28 PM, rugk wrote:
> Personally, I'd like such a system very much. It would make it possible for
> regular users to participate…
> And such participation can be the first step to becoming deeper involved into
> the project and becoming a packager, e.g.
>
> I don't know
Personally, I'd like such a system very much. It would make it possible for
regular users to participate…
And such participation can be the first step to becoming deeper involved into
the project and becoming a packager, e.g.
I don't know phpback, but uservoice is a popular software. It is propr
> I searched for tworld, is that the "Tile World" game recreating "Chip's
> Challenge"?
Yes.
> wonder what Legal's opinion on that would be.
It worked in Debian. ;)
Basically they did not package the original game files. I think they are even
not included in the upstream project. They just st
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 10:49 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:41:15AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > It'd be *nice* if there would be
> > > a maintained list, although I very much agree that it shouldn't be
> > > presented as something which a pool of developers are hovering
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:41:15AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > It'd be *nice* if there would be
> > a maintained list, although I very much agree that it shouldn't be
> > presented as something which a pool of developers are hovering over.
> It'd be nice, but I'd argue that a list that is perpetua
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> It'd be *nice* if there would be
> a maintained list, although I very much agree that it shouldn't be
> presented as something which a pool of developers are hovering over.
It'd be nice, but I'd argue that a list that is perpetually ignore
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:55:08PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There's a wiki page for this, but frankly I'd suggest it's not a high
> priority because we just don't have a pool of people hanging around
> looking for stuff to package; the existing page is huge and contains
> things that have be
On 2017-06-14, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 01:22 +0200, rugk wrote:
>> Finally I'm giving a list of some very useful pieces of software I am
>> partially missing after switching from Debian.
>
> There's a wiki page for this
The wiki cannnot be edited by people without any FAS
I have a bit of personal interest in Tox, so I took a look. qTox cannot be
included in the official repo because of dependency on ffmpeg. The dependency
list for uTox looks like it could be worked with (the filter_audio lib looks
the worst to me).
I searched for tworld, is that the "Tile World"
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 01:22 +0200, rugk wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been looking into how to suggest packages for inclusion in Fedora
> for some time. See
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/106042/where-do-i-request-new-packages-to-be-added-to-the-fedora-repos/.
>
> Finally I'm giving a list of
Hi,
I've been looking into how to suggest packages for inclusion in Fedora
for some time. See
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/106042/where-do-i-request-new-packages-to-be-added-to-the-fedora-repos/.
Finally I'm giving a list of some very useful pieces of software I am
partially miss
29 matches
Mail list logo