Packages requires /sbin/service.

After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As a workaround I have put Provides: /sbin/service in the initscript spec, but I think that

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:38:53 +0100 Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. > Unfortunately there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, > which was recently moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were > uninstallable. As a workaround I have put Pro

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Pá 15. březen 2013, 17:47:05 CET, Kevin Fenzi napsal: On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:38:53 +0100 Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages w

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On 03/15/2013 05:38 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As a workaround I have put Provides: /sbin/servic

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/15/2013 05:38 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: >> >> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately >> there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently >> moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On 03/15/2013 06:53 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I am very much opposed to this change. You need to keep files which are expected to be in /bin or /sbin under these paths. /sbin is a symlink to /usr/sbin, so calling /sbin/service still works.

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On 03/15/2013 06:53 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius >> wrote: >>> >>> I am very much opposed to this change. You need to keep files which are >>> expected to be in /bin or /sbin under these path

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On 03/15/2013 07:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: Looks like you guys added provides(service) and fixed the problem. Yes, Lukáš added it. He even mentioned it in the email that started this thread. Still it would be nice to drop legacy provide name after packages stop Requiring it. Michal -- devel

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > Pá 15. březen 2013, 17:47:05 CET, Kevin Fenzi napsal: > >> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:38:53 +0100 >> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: >> >>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. >>> Unfortunately there is a lot of packages requiring /sbi

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On 03/15/2013 07:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> >> Looks like you guys added provides(service) and fixed the problem. > > > Yes, Lukáš added it. He even mentioned it in the email that started this > thread. Still it would be nice to drop legac

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On 03/15/2013 07:07 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: Well I was reading an IRC discussion on devel. I'm like a horse with blinders. "This used to work and doesn't anymore". I cannot be sure, but I think you're referring here to the breakage caused by initscripts-9.45-1 due to the missing "Provides: /sbi

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On 03/15/2013 07:07 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> >> Well I was reading an IRC discussion on devel. I'm like a horse with >> blinders. "This used to work and doesn't anymore". > > > I cannot be sure, but I think you're referring here to the brea

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On 15/03/13 11:07 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: On 03/15/2013 07:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: Looks like you guys added provides(service) and fixed the problem. Yes, Lukáš added it. He even mentioned it in the email that started this thread. Stil

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On 03/15/2013 10:38 AM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As a workaround I have put Provides: /sbin/servic

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say that anywhere? -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: > Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > >> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. > > That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say that > anywhere? but WHY are they not saying it clearly? until now UsrMove is a half-baken

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: > > Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > > > >> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. > > > > That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say that > > anywhere? >

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Am 17.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Sérgio Basto: > On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: >>> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: >>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. >>> >>> That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

2013/3/15 Lukáš Nykrýn : > After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately > there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently moved > to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As a workaround I have > put Provides: /sbin/service in the init

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately > there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently > moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As a > workaround I have put Provides: /sbin/service in the initscrip

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2013/3/15 Lukáš Nykrýn : >> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately >> there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently moved >> to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 17:31 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 17.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Sérgio Basto: > > On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> [root@fileserver:~]$ system-config-users > >> The value for the SHELL variable was not found the /etc/shells file > >> This incident

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 18.03.2013 01:06, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: >> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >>> 2013/3/15 Lukáš Nykrýn : After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately there is a lot of

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 18.03.2013 08:27, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: >> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 18.03.2013 01:06, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Fri, 15.03.13 11:07, Dan Mashal (dan.mas...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > > On 03/15/2013 07:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> > >> Looks like you guys added provides(service) and fixed the problem. > > > > > > Yes, Lukáš added it. He even mentioned

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Am 18.03.2013 04:32, schrieb Mathieu Bridon: > On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 17:31 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 17.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Sérgio Basto: >>> On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: [root@fileserver:~]$ system-config-users The value for the SHELL variable was

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: >> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: >> >>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. >> >> That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say >> that anywhere? > > but WHY are they not saying it clearly? Be

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Am 18.03.2013 08:27, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 18.03.2013 01:06, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: >>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: 2013/3/15 Lukáš Nykrýn : > After usr move packages should not ins

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: > >> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > >> > >>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. > >> > >> That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually s

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Michal Sekletar wrote: > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> > Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: >> >> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: >> >> >> >>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. >> >> >> >> That's not necessarily true. Do o

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Hi Rex, On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 07:57 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Michal Sekletar wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Reindl Harald wrote: > >> > >> > Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: > >> >> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> After usr move packages sh

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar: > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Reindl Harald wrote: >> >>> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. That's not necessar

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Hi, On Mar 19, 2013, at 13:54, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar: >> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: > Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > >> After usr move pac

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar: > > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Reindl Harald wrote: > >> > >>> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: > Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > > > After usr move

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Am 19.03.2013 18:40, schrieb Richard Vickery: > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar: > > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Reindl Harald wrote: >

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

On Mar 19, 2013 12:13 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > > > > Am 19.03.2013 18:40, schrieb Richard Vickery: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Reindl Harald > > > wrote: > > > > Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar: > > > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrot

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

Michal Sekletar wrote: >> IMHO, this needs amending to say: >> In addition, *new* Fedora packages MUST NOT ... > > I would argue that this is not what should be done. Packagers should fix > their packages instead of relying on the old behavior which in now > basically compat only thing. This is