Petr Pisar wrote:
> I don't think group responsibility works. The result is every group
> memeber says it does somebody else and then bugs will never get fixed.
Group responsibility has been working fine for KDE SIG ever since its
inception with the Core-Extras Merge in Fedora 7. No matter who th
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 06:01:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> >>>On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Note that the
On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig
wants to continue
> As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key
> reset,
> packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
> comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
>
> The list of orphaned packages is here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The list of orphaned packages is here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt
>
> The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/a
Peter Gordon a écrit :
> And if it's agreeable with Casper, I've also requested comaintainership
> of qrencode. =)
Approved in devel, f16 and f15 branch
Thank you for your involvement :)
--
Pour encrypter vos emails
Clef GPG ID : 83288189
Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328
I grabbed ruby-shadow, as it's needed for Puppet. I would love co-maintainers.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I've taken iec16022 for the Fedora 15/16/Devel branches. I would
appreciate assistance in the EPEL branches though. (I've left those
orphaned.)
And if it's agreeable with Casper, I've also requested comaintainership
of qrencode. =)
I have done so because another of my packages, gLabels, requires
> The list of orphaned packages is here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt
I took ownership of the haskell packages of bos: I had already been maintaining
for a while anyway as comaintainer.
And it makes more sense that one person owns all
Le 11/01/2012 03:30, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> The list of orphaned packages is here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt
php-ZendFramework
>
have a co-maintainer (heller)
I could ownership on it or co-ownership as heller want.
Remi.
> The list of orphaned packages is here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt
I'll be taking over eclipse-oprofile and eclipse-callgraph.
--
Roland Grunberg
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:44:16AM -0500, solarflow99 wrote:
> I don't see slim in the list, but I know its been orphaned. I'd like
> to take that one if I can.
You can sign up right here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/slim
-Toshio
pgpn8JWUP2rJh.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:26:59AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> People on the list already asked for maintainance of various Perl
> group like perl-Moose-*. So, could you go once more over those
> packages, which you gave me and orphan them?
> Everyone from Perl SIG can take the group of perl
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
> packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
> comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
Took hfsplus-tools.
I don't see slim in the list, but I know its been orphaned. I'd like
to take that one if I can.
2012/1/11 Casper :
> Hello
> I've taken:
>
> * qrencode
> * dnstracer
>
> So co-maintener are welcome too
>
> Matthieu
> --
> Pour encrypter vos emails
> Clef GPG ID : 83288189
> Empreinte : CC26 692
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The list of orphaned packages is here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt
>
I've taken over tetex-IEEEtrans and Jigdo.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproje
Hello
I've taken:
* qrencode
* dnstracer
So co-maintener are welcome too
Matthieu
--
Pour encrypter vos emails
Clef GPG ID : 83288189
Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189
pgpRbLYWonwUe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
I took clips and clipsmm, I was the only maintainer and I'm an active
developer for clipsmm.
Tim
--
Tim Niemueller www.niemueller.de
=
Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein)
--
devel mai
Took the followin in Fedora (not EPEL) for now:
perl-Algorithm-Annotate
perl-Data-Hierarchy
perl-File-chdir
perl-Time-Progress
perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree *
rogue
tinyfugue
-P
pgpOPEL64YCmK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On 01/11/2012 02:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is h
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> >On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >>Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig
> >>wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want
* Ralf Corsepius [11/01/2012 09:59] :
>
> Also, in cases nobody steps up and takes action, you (who is
> subscribed to the perl-list) could step up in any case.
If perl-sig is the maintainer, only provenpackagers will be able to commit.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have
packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be "colaboratively"
m
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have
packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be "colaboratively"
maintained. It's at least how I remember the situat
I have taken:
* ack
* perl-Data-Types
* perl-MongoDB
* Zim
robin
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Brendan Jones
wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key
>> reset,
>> packages that had owners who were inacti
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is h
Le 11/01/2012 03:30, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
> packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
> comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
>
> The list of orphaned packag
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:38:56PM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 01/10/2012 07:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
> >packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
> >comaintainer who were ina
On 01/10/2012 07:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is h
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have
> packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be "colaboratively"
> maintained. It's at least how I remember the situation when JPO had
> quit and had left 100s of
On 01/10/2012 09:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is h
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is h
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructu
33 matches
Mail list logo
