Re: Packages without the Rawhide branch?

2015-01-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:09:04 +0100 Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2015-01-29, 01:29 GMT, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > I don't have numbers on how many packages have this need but I > > predict that the efforts to get this to work, test it, deploy it, > > etc. are vastly greater than the time saved not havin

Re: Packages without the Rawhide branch?

2015-01-29 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-01-29, 01:29 GMT, Peter Hutterer wrote: > I don't have numbers on how many packages have this need but I predict that > the efforts to get this to work, test it, deploy it, etc. are vastly greater > than the time saved not having to retire a package :) Certainly, but a) we are geeks, so w

Re: Packages without the Rawhide branch?

2015-01-28 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 01:04:34AM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote: > And couldn't we make the script which builds the repos > understand some syntax extension to do it? E.g., what about > Perhaps it would do just the retirement of devel branch. > > What about that? The process is going to change soon

Re: Packages without the Rawhide branch?

2015-01-28 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 01:04:34AM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2015-01-28, 21:10 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> I have just created (and got approved) python-mako1.0 as > >> a compatibility package for EPEL-6. When I asked for the new > >> repo for it, I expect to get also devel/Rawhide branch fo

Re: Packages without the Rawhide branch?

2015-01-28 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-01-28, 21:10 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> I have just created (and got approved) python-mako1.0 as >> a compatibility package for EPEL-6. When I asked for the new >> repo for it, I expect to get also devel/Rawhide branch for it. >> However, I don't see any purpose of it. Should I just orp

Re: Packages without the Rawhide branch?

2015-01-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:48:02 +0100 Matěj Cepl wrote: > Hi, > > this is a question which I have encountered couple of times, but > I have always forgot to ask about it: is it possible to have > a package without Rawhide (devel) branch? Nope. > I have just created (and got approved) python-ma

Packages without the Rawhide branch?

2015-01-28 Thread Matěj Cepl
Hi, this is a question which I have encountered couple of times, but I have always forgot to ask about it: is it possible to have a package without Rawhide (devel) branch? I have just created (and got approved) python-mako1.0 as a compatibility package for EPEL-6. When I asked for the new rep