On Fri, 25 May 2012 13:41:14 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> What worries me is that pyroscope has a "rtorrent-extended" interface,
> which is just application of some patches to the original rtorrent
> source. It even uses the rtorrent tars, the code isn't forked or
> anything.
What exactly you plan
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 09:15 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On-the-fly downloading of source archives and patches won't be
> acceptable,
> since these files must be included in the src.rpm (with the packagers
> being
> in the position to control what will be used/packaged).
>
> It would be necess
On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:23:59 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I was wondering if anyone's ever considered packaging pyroscope[1] for
> Fedora? It adds quite a lot of functionality to rtorrent.
>
> I've just started looking into it, and the building looks
Hey folks,
I was wondering if anyone's ever considered packaging pyroscope[1] for
Fedora? It adds quite a lot of functionality to rtorrent.
I've just started looking into it, and the building looks pretty messy.
This is the build script they use[2]. It downloads everything, includin
