Once upon a time, Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com said:
Bonus points for anaconda configuring a working agetty login if the install
console was serial. That is, run agetty using the same linespeed as the
install and add the serial device to securetty.
This is handled automatically now; if the
On Wed, 24.11.10 00:06, Paul Wouters (p...@xelerance.com) wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
That way most distros would only have to install one getty implementation,
and can use it for both serial consoles and VCs.
Yes please.
Bonus points for anaconda
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said:
We currently still use the old securetty tool to patch those terminals
into /etc/securetty on demand. I have submitted a patch to pam_securetty
however, to make it look for console= on the kernel cmdline internally,
which when
On Wed, 24.11.10 14:29, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said:
We currently still use the old securetty tool to patch those terminals
into /etc/securetty on demand. I have submitted a patch to pam_securetty
however, to make
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
That way most distros would only have to install one getty implementation,
and can use it for both serial consoles and VCs.
Yes please.
Bonus points for anaconda configuring a working agetty login if the install
console was serial. That is, run
On 2010-11-11, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Do we really want to keep mingetty around?
[...]
You apparently see value in keeping two almost identical getty
implementations around. Can you elaborate why? Is there any feature
missing in agetty that mingetty has?
Till
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:33:26PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
I ended up being the owner of mingetty by chance, because I used to
maintain it in the OLPC collection and the previous maintainer released
the package.
Since you're clearly working on it, I think it would make sense to pass
On Wed, 10.11.10 21:33, Bernie Innocenti (ber...@codewiz.org) wrote:
Hello Petr,
I ended up being the owner of mingetty by chance, because I used to
maintain it in the OLPC collection and the previous maintainer released
the package.
Do we really want to keep mingetty around?
We discussed
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:53:47PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 10.11.10 21:33, Bernie Innocenti (ber...@codewiz.org) wrote:
Hello Petr,
I ended up being the owner of mingetty by chance, because I used to
maintain it in the OLPC collection and the previous maintainer
Hello Petr,
I ended up being the owner of mingetty by chance, because I used to
maintain it in the OLPC collection and the previous maintainer released
the package.
Since you're clearly working on it, I think it would make sense to pass
ownership to you. If you agree, I will orphan the package
10 matches
Mail list logo
