R: Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)

2011-06-02 Thread pinto.e...@gmail.com
Messaggio originale Da: Peter Robinson Inviato: 01/06/2011, 22:41 A: Development discussions related to Fedora Oggetto: Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01) On 1 Jun 2011 19:44, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson

BTRFS concerns (was: Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01))

2011-06-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:15:59PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't believe 3-4 months is enough time to test it well enough. On 2.6.38.x I still get

Re: BTRFS concerns (was: Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01))

2011-06-02 Thread Josef Bacik
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:15:59PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't believe

Re: BTRFS concerns (was: Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01))

2011-06-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:44:46PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com said: These sort of issues are my priority and I've spent the last 2 months specifically working on the kvm performance differences between ext4 and btrfs. Now we're not on par

Re: BTRFS concerns (was: Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01))

2011-06-02 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com said: Maybe I'm not understanding your question correctly, but a filesystem is more general than LVM. You can create directories corresponding to your current VGs and files for your LVs, with the advantage that you can nest directories

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)

2011-06-01 Thread Peter Robinson
I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't believe 3-4 months is enough time to test it well enough. On 2.6.38.x I still get regular kernel abrt crashes on resume. Is it even marked stable in the

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)

2011-06-01 Thread Josef Bacik
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't believe 3-4 months is enough time to test it well enough. On 2.6.38.x I

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)

2011-06-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On 1 Jun 2011 19:44, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't believe

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)

2011-06-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Peter Robinson wrote: Yes. Well at least I've submitted them using abrt to wherever is sends the kernel crash dumps. Not done a manual separate bug though. If you add the BZ#s here or CC Josef on them I'm sure he'd be glad to help. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2011-06-01)

2011-05-31 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must