Re: Plan to remove libxml2-static

2018-01-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:04:36AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello, > > is anybody against of removal of libxml2-static package? It is not used by any > Fedora package. Static libraries are useful occasionally, especially as Neal said for

Re: Plan to remove libxml2-static

2018-01-24 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 14:35 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 24 January 2018 at 11:21, Tomasz Kłoczko > wrote: > [..] > > Fact that those libraries are listed in: > > > > Libs.private: -lz -llzma -lm > > > > does not mean that some devel

Re: Plan to remove libxml2-static

2018-01-24 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On 24 January 2018 at 11:21, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: [..] > Fact that those libraries are listed in: > > Libs.private: -lz -llzma -lm > > does not mean that some devel packages are needed. Libs.private is > used on STATIC linking!!! Use static linking in Fedora is highly > REDUCED > So far

Re: Plan to remove libxml2-static

2018-01-24 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 24/01/18 13:15 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On 24 January 2018 at 11:41, Igor Gnatenko wrote: [..] > Other changes discarded from my set of changes: Please, don't mix issues / suggestions. I was asking ONLY about libxml2-static. And I'm only using your email to show which other changes

Re: Plan to remove libxml2-static

2018-01-24 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On 24 January 2018 at 11:41, Igor Gnatenko wrote: [..] > > Other changes discarded from my set of changes: > > Please, don't mix issues / suggestions. I was asking ONLY about > libxml2-static. > And I'm only using your email to show which other changes your radar does not detected :P I'm using

Re: Plan to remove libxml2-static

2018-01-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:04 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hello, > > is anybody against of removal of libxml2-static package? It is not used by any > Fedora package. I would appreciate it if it wasn't removed. I'm using the libxml2-static (along with a number of other static libraries) in experim

Re: Plan to remove libxml2-static

2018-01-24 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 11:21 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 24 January 2018 at 09:04, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Hello, > > > > is anybody against of removal of libxml2-static package?

Re: Plan to remove libxml2-static

2018-01-24 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On 24 January 2018 at 11:21, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: [..] > It is easy to (simple) check .. > > [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ egrep -e 'BuildRequires:.*libxml-static' * > [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ Really sorry. Typo in regexp (s/libxml/libxml2/) but result still is the same: [tkloczko@domek

Re: Plan to remove libxml2-static

2018-01-24 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On 24 January 2018 at 09:04, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello, > > is anybody against of removal of libxml2-static package? It is not used by any > Fedora package. It is easy to (simple) check .. [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ egrep -e 'BuildRequ

Plan to remove libxml2-static

2018-01-24 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, is anybody against of removal of libxml2-static package? It is not used by any Fedora package. - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlpoTCQACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0yCbhAAku+w8JAHVpftAeDXmTIU