Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 2020-10-05 13:53, Richard Shaw wrote: I updated fail2ban and gmsh and committed to master. I assume that is sufficient? Thank you! As I understand it, it is sufficient. But since repo queries look at "live" packages, you might get some spurious notifications about this in the future.

Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

Dne 05. 10. 20 v 12:55 Tomas Hrnciar napsal(a): > copr-messaging   schlupov  Fixed in upstream. https://pagure.io/copr/copr/pull-request/1534 Will propagate to Fedora soon. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys

Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 6:56 AM Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > this is a follow-up email to the one I wrote a couple of months ago > (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GCPGM34ZGEOVUHSBGZTRYR5XKHTIJ3T7/). > sgallagh nodejs I've

Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 12:55:49 +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > ankursinha arbor python-petlink  I've fixed both of these now. Apologies for the delay. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London

Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

Hi, I think fontforge is a false positive. It's just one line which imports setuptools and that is from third party sources in the pycontrib directory. That file (or directory) is not installed by the fontforge package. Regards, Parag ___ devel mailing

Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

I updated fail2ban and gmsh and committed to master. I assume that is sufficient? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello everyone, there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only works because python3-devel (transitively) depends on

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello everyone, there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only works because python3-devel (transitively) depends on

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:28:00PM -, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > > > This package depends on python3-devel. However the last build.log: > > > > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/qemu/5.0.0/2.fc33/data/logs/...

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: swt2c  congruity python-pexpect python-pypubsub python-pytest-forked python-pytest-timeout python-pytest-xdist python-suds  All fixed in rawhide except for python-pexpect, which doesn't actually use setuptools. Strangely, it only uses it when

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

> suve copydeps dnstwist python-ssdeep Fixed in rawhide (just dist-git, didn't run the builds). Should there be a new release for any of these, I'll fix it for F32/31, too. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:26 AM Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > python-zodbpicklejjames > sympycbm jjames jussilehtola orion I fixed these two in Rawhide, and also fixed a python 3.9 bug in sympy and an endianness bug in python-gmpy2 en passant. -- Jerry James

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

Tomas Hrnciar writes: > We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit BuildRequires for > python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used. It will help > us with testing new versions of setuptools in the future or with > decoupling Python and setuptools. Today, if we want to know if a

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > somlo python-logzero python-migen Fixed in rawhide. Thanks, --Gabriel ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > somlo python-logzero python-migen Fixed in rawhide. Thanks, --Gabriel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 23. 06. 20 18:26, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: churchyard python-django python-ipykernel python-more-itertools python-ndg_httpsclient thonny All fixed at least in git. The changes should be visible in repoquery upon the next rebuild. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 23. 06. 20 18:26, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: churchyard python-django python-ipykernel python-more-itertools python-ndg_httpsclient thonny All fixed at least in git. The changes should be visible in repoquery upon the next rebuild. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

Thanks for the list. > ankursinha python-PyLEMS python-SALib python-airspeed python-duecredit > python-efel python-feedgenerator python-fsleyes python-fsleyes-props > python-fsleyes-widgets python-fslpy python-hl7 python-indexed_gzip > python-klusta python-libNeuroML python-matplotlib-scalebar

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

Am 23.06.20 um 18:26 schrieb Tomas Hrnciar: > fschwarz   pdfarranger python-ndg_httpsclient python-pdfrw python-pyrfc3339 > python-tinycss2 I fixed python-ndg_httpsclient, python-pdfrw, python-pyrfc3339 and python-tinycss2 dreua fixed pdfarranger. Felix

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

Am 23.06.20 um 18:26 schrieb Tomas Hrnciar: > fschwarz   pdfarranger python-ndg_httpsclient python-pdfrw python-pyrfc3339 > python-tinycss2 I fixed python-ndg_httpsclient, python-pdfrw, python-pyrfc3339 and python-tinycss2 dreua fixed pdfarranger. Felix

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 24. 06. 20 20:21, Andy Mender wrote: *Packages MAY use the automatic Python dependency generator. This generator uses upstream egg/dist metadata (such as setuptool’s install_requires ) This is about the runtime

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 18:37, Adam Williamson wrote: > IMBW, but I think I recall the Python packaging guidelines specifically > said that you could or should (I forget which) just BR python-devel and > not BR python-setuptools at some point. At this point there seems to be > no explicit

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:26 PM Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > Hello everyone, > > there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at > buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only > works > because python3-devel (transitively) depends on

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

Tomas Hrnciar writes: > pyxattr defolos frankcrawford kevin szpak Fixed and rebuild in Rawhide. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

So, turns out I got this right somehow (setup.py defaults to distutils) but not really: We don't even use setup.py but build the portmidi python module directly (cython/gcc/install). I removed setup.py and rebuilt, this works fine and produces the same package. So, I suggest removing setup.py

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 23. 06. 20 18:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 23. 06. 20 18:36, Adam Williamson wrote: IMBW, but I think I recall the Python packaging guidelines specifically said that you could or should (I forget which) just BR python-devel and not BR python-setuptools at some point. At this point there seems

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 23.06.2020 18:26, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > xvitaly    libolm python-emoji python-node-semver python-patch-ng > python-pytelegrambotapi python-wloc  Fixed. Thanks. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 18:26 +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > [...] > tpm2-pkcs11 jjelen pbrobinson Done for this package in rawhide (without rebuilt yet). Regards, -- Jakub Jelen Senior Software Engineer Security Technologies Red Hat, Inc. ___

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 17.26.23 WEST Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > pygsljamatos Done. -- José Abílio ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 6/23/20 9:26 AM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello everyone, there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only works because python3-devel (transitively) depends on python3-setuptools. We would

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 6/23/20 9:26 AM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello everyone, there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only works because python3-devel (transitively) depends on python3-setuptools. We would

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 23. 06. 20 21:58, Michael J Gruber wrote: The hit on portmidi is a false positive: while it allows to be built with setuptools it by default does not, and the spec does not override the default. Is there a way to specify this (other than patching out anything "setuptools" from the source)?

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 6/23/20 12:26 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit > BuildRequires for python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used. > nonamedotc python-nmrglue python-rope spyder  I have added buildrequires on setuptools for these three packages.

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 6/23/20 12:26 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit > BuildRequires for python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used. > nonamedotc python-nmrglue python-rope spyder  I have added buildrequires on setuptools for these three packages.

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

Hi there Thanks for the clear posting. I have updated dblatex with the BR in rawhide. I guess it's enough to trickle this down to other branches when they need a rebuild anyways. The hit on portmidi is a false positive: while it allows to be built with setuptools it by default does not, and

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > This package depends on python3-devel. However the last build.log: > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/qemu/5.0.0/2.fc33/data/logs/... > > does not contain the substring /setupto/ anywhere. Nor does the >

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > qemu amitshah berrange bonzini crobinso dwmw2 ehabkost > jforbes lkundrak quintela rjones This package depends on python3-devel. However the last build.log:

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 23. 06. 20 18:36, Adam Williamson wrote: IMBW, but I think I recall the Python packaging guidelines specifically said that you could or should (I forget which) just BR python-devel and not BR python-setuptools at some point. At this point there seems to be no explicit mention, but the sample

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 23. 06. 20 18:36, Adam Williamson wrote: IMBW, but I think I recall the Python packaging guidelines specifically said that you could or should (I forget which) just BR python-devel and not BR python-setuptools at some point. At this point there seems to be no explicit mention, but the sample

Re: Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 18:26 +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > Hello everyone, > > there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using > setuptools at > buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This > only works > because python3-devel (transitively) depends on