Hi,
W dniu 11 września 2011 22:47 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> 2011/9/11 Tom Lane :
>> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
>>> 2011/9/11 Tom Lane :
Yeah. I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much
ready to go on my end. I would be prepared t
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 22:55:21 -0400,
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> (This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0
> for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd
> files.)
I don't remember what I did for 9.0. I either found that stuff or I did
a dump and restore.
An
On 09/12/2011 10:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruno Wolff III writes:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:16:47 -0400,
Tom Lane wrote:
OK, it's built and filed at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/postgresql-9.1.0-1.fc16
One thing I noticed is that service postgresql initdb and
service postgresql
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:16:47 -0400,
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK, it's built and filed at
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/postgresql-9.1.0-1.fc16
> One thing I noticed is that service postgresql initdb and
> service postgresql help no longer work. I was hopi
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:16:47 -0400,
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> OK, it's built and filed at
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/postgresql-9.1.0-1.fc16
One thing I noticed is that service postgresql initdb and
service postgresql help no longer work. I was hoping they'd redirect
to the system
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah. I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much
>> ready to go on my end. I would be prepared to push 9.1 into f16 on
>> Monday if there were enough people willing to test and up-karma it
>> before the freeze ... any volunte
2011/9/11 Tom Lane :
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
>> 2011/9/11 Tom Lane :
>>> Yeah. I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much
>>> ready to go on my end. I would be prepared to push 9.1 into f16 on
>>> Monday if there were enough people willing to test an
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
> 2011/9/11 Tom Lane :
>> Yeah. I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much
>> ready to go on my end. I would be prepared to push 9.1 into f16 on
>> Monday if there were enough people willing to test and up-karma it
>> before the
2011/9/11 Tom Lane :
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:13:03 +0200,
>> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> F16 beta is targeted at 2011-09-27, so there is still a little time to
>>> upgrade PostgreSQL for this release.
>
>> The beta freeze starts two weeks before that and even if
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah. I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much
> ready to go on my end. I would be prepared to push 9.1 into f16 on
> Monday if there were enough people willing to test and up-karma it
> before the freeze ... any volunt
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:27:53 -0400,
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Yeah. I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much
> ready to go on my end. I would be prepared to push 9.1 into f16 on
> Monday if there were enough people willing to test and up-karma it
> before the freeze ...
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:13:03 +0200,
> MichaÅ Piotrowski wrote:
>> F16 beta is targeted at 2011-09-27, so there is still a little time to
>> upgrade PostgreSQL for this release.
> The beta freeze starts two weeks before that and even if it gets in the next
> coupl
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:13:03 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/7/2 Tom Lane :
> > =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
> >> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
> >> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
> >
> > If upstre
Hi,
2011/7/2 Tom Lane :
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
>> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
>> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
>
> If upstream releases it in time, it'll be in F16. I would put the odds
> of that no better t
2011/7/4 Stanislav Ochotnicky :
> Excerpts from Michał Piotrowski's message of Mon Jul 04 13:11:06 +0200 2011:
>> Unfortunately I do not have enough java programming experience to help
>> you in fixing problems.
>
> There might be a more simple way to do it though. There was already a
> started luc
Excerpts from Michał Piotrowski's message of Mon Jul 04 13:11:06 +0200 2011:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/7/4 Alexander Kurtakov :
> > On 09:34:10 AM Saturday, July 02, 2011 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
> >> 9.1 is in beta2 now
Hi,
2011/7/4 Alexander Kurtakov :
> On 09:34:10 AM Saturday, July 02, 2011 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
>> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
>>
>> It would be nice to see Lucene Core in F16. There is
On 09:34:10 AM Saturday, July 02, 2011 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
>
> It would be nice to see Lucene Core in F16. There is an old Lucene
> 2.9.x for F16 - the lates
2011/7/2 Tom Lane :
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
>> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
>> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
>
> If upstream releases it in time, it'll be in F16. I would put the odds
> of that no better than 5
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
If upstream releases it in time, it'll be in F16. I would put the odds
of that no better than 50-50, though. I'm not going
Hi,
Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
It would be nice to see Lucene Core in F16. There is an old Lucene
2.9.x for F16 - the latest upstream version is 3.3.
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
21 matches
Mail list logo
