On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:08 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:40:50AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > > Next time FESCo should forbid gcc updates to unreleased versions in
> > > branched Fedora r
Il giorno mar, 19/05/2020 alle 18.43 +0200, Dan Horák ha scritto:
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 17:42:29 +0200
> Guido Aulisi wrote:
>
> > Il giorno mar, 19/05/2020 alle 12.11 +0200, Florian Weimer ha
> > scritto:
> > > * Guido Aulisi:
> > >
> > > > I'm getting some strange errors from some packages bui
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:40:50AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> > Next time FESCo should forbid gcc updates to unreleased versions in
> > branched Fedora releases.
> >
> > Now we need a new mass rebuild in Fedora 32 with fixed
On Tue, 19 May 2020 17:42:29 +0200
Guido Aulisi wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 19/05/2020 alle 12.11 +0200, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> > * Guido Aulisi:
> >
> > > I'm getting some strange errors from some packages built for f32
> > > with
> > > gcc 10.0 [0].
> > > Building with g++ 10.1 ardourd5 seem
Il giorno mar, 19/05/2020 alle 12.11 +0200, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> * Guido Aulisi:
>
> > I'm getting some strange errors from some packages built for f32
> > with
> > gcc 10.0 [0].
> > Building with g++ 10.1 ardourd5 seems fine...
> >
> > It seems GCC 10.0 had some bugs that could be discov
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:58:47AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 19.05.2020 11:40, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > As I wrote in my direct response to Guido, doing a mass rebuild for
> > fedora just isn't possible in released branches. So, the best we can
> > do is to deal with issues as p
* Guido Aulisi:
> I'm getting some strange errors from some packages built for f32 with
> gcc 10.0 [0].
> Building with g++ 10.1 ardourd5 seems fine...
>
> It seems GCC 10.0 had some bugs that could be discovered only at
> runtime. Did you have any similar problems?
>
> Ciao
> Guido
> FAS: tartina
On 19.05.2020 11:40, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> As I wrote in my direct response to Guido, doing a mass rebuild for
> fedora just isn't possible in released branches. So, the best we can
> do is to deal with issues as people become aware of them and report
> them, and then rebuild those few broken pa
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
> Next time FESCo should forbid gcc updates to unreleased versions in
> branched Fedora releases.
>
> Now we need a new mass rebuild in Fedora 32 with fixed gcc 10.1.1 version.
As I wrote in my direct response to Guido, doing a mass
On 19.05.2020 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> It seems GCC 10.0 had some bugs that could be discovered only at
> runtime. Did you have any similar problems?
GCC 10.0.1 was broken. Maintainers of gcc just used SVN trunk in
production without any real tests.
I experienced lots of ICEs and multiple cra
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:33 AM Guido Aulisi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm getting some strange errors from some packages built for f32 with
> gcc 10.0 [0].
> Building with g++ 10.1 ardourd5 seems fine...
>
> It seems GCC 10.0 had some bugs that could be discovered only at
> runtime. Did you have any simi
Hi,
I'm getting some strange errors from some packages built for f32 with
gcc 10.0 [0].
Building with g++ 10.1 ardourd5 seems fine...
It seems GCC 10.0 had some bugs that could be discovered only at
runtime. Did you have any similar problems?
Ciao
Guido
FAS: tartina
[0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.
12 matches
Mail list logo