Re: (fedora) Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:03:49AM GMT, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 8:06 AM Dridi Boukelmoune > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 10:21 AM Andreas K. Huettel > > wrote: > > > > > > Seems like the fedora list moderators decided to not let the follow-ups > > > pass to th

Re: (fedora) Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-06 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 8:06 AM Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 10:21 AM Andreas K. Huettel > wrote: > > > > Seems like the fedora list moderators decided to not let the follow-ups > > pass to the fedora-dev list, > > so please if you're interested follow the discussion on on

Re: (fedora) Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-06 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 10:21 AM Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Seems like the fedora list moderators decided to not let the follow-ups pass > to the fedora-dev list, > so please if you're interested follow the discussion on one of the other > involved mailing lists. > I'm fairly sure this is also

(fedora) Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-06 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Seems like the fedora list moderators decided to not let the follow-ups pass to the fedora-dev list, so please if you're interested follow the discussion on one of the other involved mailing lists. I'm fairly sure this is also relevant here. E.g., see for the thread https://sourceware.org/pipe

Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Dear all, in Gentoo Linux we want to change our CHOST triplets for 32-bit glibc systems that use 64-bit time_t, since this is technically an ABI change which breaks binary compatibility [1]. We are thinking of adding a "t64" suffix to the ABI field, resulting in for example i686-pc-linux-gnut6