Jaroslav Reznik schreef op wo 16-01-2013 om 12:35 [-0500]:
See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/175876.html
for details. Once gcc-4.8.0-* is built into Fedora, after a few days or weeks
a mass rebuild should be performed.
I see that gcc 4.8 was just imported in
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:22:00PM +0100, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik schreef op wo 16-01-2013 om 12:35 [-0500]:
See
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/175876.html
for details. Once gcc-4.8.0-* is built into Fedora, after a few days or
weeks
a
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com writes:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/GCC48
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:45:04PM +0100, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
is gcc bug[1] fixed in 4.8.0? it could bring a lot of nasty problems
with app which using atomit_t (unsigned long)
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55981
I think it isn't yet committed, has been approved though.
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/GCC48 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GCC48
GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is currently
in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test mass rebuild on x86_64
Looking at the schedule Wouldn't it be better to do the mass rebuild in
Rawhide before the branch?
If we're really looking at a
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:15:25 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is
currently in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test
mass rebuild on x86_64
Looking at the schedule Wouldn't it be better
Jaroslav Reznik schreef op wo 16-01-2013 om 12:35 [-0500]:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:15 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is
currently
in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test mass rebuild on
x86_64
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:15 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is
currently
in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test mass rebuild on
x86_64
Looking at the schedule Wouldn't it be better to do the mass
On 01/16/2013 11:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
We need to decide the schedule soon IMHO.
Perhaps the schedule should be decided in part on time to do mass
rebuild after gcc 4.8.0 is released. The ARM team would really like to
see 4.8 in F19 because 4.8 is the first gcc with native Aarch64
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:52:04AM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 01/16/2013 11:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
We need to decide the schedule soon IMHO.
Perhaps the schedule should be decided in part on time to do mass
rebuild after gcc 4.8.0 is released. The ARM team would really like
to see
On 01/16/2013 12:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The mass rebuild doesn't have to be with a released compiler (and in fact,
usually has been performed with a prerelease compiler), it is just
important that the release is released with a released compiler.
Even better! Will the 3 failed builds
- Original Message -
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:15:25 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and
is
currently in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test
mass rebuild on x86_64
Looking at
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:38:29PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
Even better! Will the 3 failed builds mentioned at the beginning of
the thread be resolved by the end-of-January estimated ready to go
time? Are there any outstanding bugs in the 4.8-pre compiler that
might have major impact on
15 matches
Mail list logo
