On 01/04/15 12:54, Bill Nottingham wrote:
David Timms (dti...@iinet.net.au) said:
...
I thought about trying to reliably parse major/minor/subminor versions in
bash, and track it against where things were implemented. But then just went
the lazy route:
if appstream-util --help | grep -q
On 1 April 2015 at 11:50, Neal Gompa ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it alright to just commit it as an extra package source existing within
the package script sources repo (like how we handle patches) until we can
get it upstreamed?
Sure, that's fine as well, thanks.
Richard.
--
devel mailing
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:34 AM, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On 01/04/15 12:54, Bill Nottingham wrote:
David Timms (dti...@iinet.net.au) said:
...
I thought about trying to reliably parse major/minor/subminor versions in
bash, and track it against where things were implemented.
On 27/03/15 04:48, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:40:29PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
So, the overwhelming amount of help I received (one person) meant I
spent the whole of today fixing up 230 packages. Most of the packages
Looks like about 22 hours since you asked for
David Timms (dti...@iinet.net.au) said:
On 01/04/15 00:34, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 31 March 2015 at 14:07, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I see my package was adjusted, but I can't get it to build:
I only build the new-enough libappstream-glib into rawhide -- seeing
as most
On 01/04/15 00:34, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 31 March 2015 at 14:07, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I see my package was adjusted, but I can't get it to build:
I only build the new-enough libappstream-glib into rawhide -- seeing
as most of the f23 builds have succeeded I'll do the
On 31 March 2015 at 14:07, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I see my package was adjusted, but I can't get it to build:
I only build the new-enough libappstream-glib into rawhide -- seeing
as most of the f23 builds have succeeded I'll do the same for F22 and
submit an update. F20 is much
Thank you, I've received the notifications.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 25 March 2015 at 19:40, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
-- I can't promise cookies, but I'll really appreciate it and it means
the applications won't disappear from Fedora 23. Yell if you have any
questions.
So, the overwhelming amount of help I received (one person) meant I
spent
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:40:29PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
So, the overwhelming amount of help I received (one person) meant I
spent the whole of today fixing up 230 packages. Most of the packages
Looks like about 22 hours since you asked for help, so... I dunno, one
person seems pretty
In the effort to make the AppStream generation simpler I'm going to
deprecate the fedora-appstream repo[1]. This was always designed to be
a stop-gap until upstreams had done new tarball releases and to
rescue applications that we care a lot about, and we're now at a
point where over 50% of
11 matches
Mail list logo
