Re: Python packages not compliant to Fedora guidelines

On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 11:00:29AM +0100, Haïkel wrote: > Problem is that these guidelines are not compliant with EL7 guidelines. > I have the reverse problem that packages from EPEL7 don't build > anymore on CentOS. Where are these guidelines documented? Kind regards Till -- devel mailing list

Re: Python packages not compliant to Fedora guidelines

Haïkel wrote: > (Qt packaging experience proved that was the only sane option). Actually, renaming qt to qt4 should be fairly easy, and probably should be done now (in fact, should have been done for F22), it's just a matter of a rename and Obsoletes/Provides. Of course, the issue becomes more

Python packages not compliant to Fedora guidelines

In past days I filled many review requests for various python libraries, in order to submit python-netdiff [1] and python-django-netjsongraph [2]. During this process, I noticed that a lot of python packages are not compliant to Fedora Guidelines for packaging Python stuff [3]. So you have to deal

Re: Python packages not compliant to Fedora guidelines

2016-02-06 9:44 GMT+01:00 Germano Massullo : > In past days I filled many review requests for various python libraries, in > order to submit python-netdiff [1] and python-django-netjsongraph [2]. > During this process, I noticed that a lot of python packages are not >