Re: Qt 5.0

2013-03-09 Thread Richard Vickery
Try to take the criticism as something more productive than mere rudeness. I doubt anyone here has the internation of being rude, though at times we may appear as such. We're all just trying to make progress, and some have other pressures. Hope this helps, Richard On Mar 9, 2013 3:20 PM, "Samuel S

Re: Qt 5.0

2013-03-09 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 03/09/2013 03:55 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: It will get included when it gets included. Fedora 19 is not even branched yet. We all have families and jobs here. Feel free to download and compile the source yourself if a house is on fire and only Qt 5 can save it. Why do you feel the need to be s

Re: Qt 5.0

2013-03-09 Thread Dan Mashal
On Mar 8, 2013 11:53 AM, "Rahul Sundaram" wrote: > > Hi > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Eduardo Jorge wrote: >> >> >> >> Why Qt 5.0 was not yet included in Rawhide/Fedora 19? > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Re: Qt 5.0

2013-03-08 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Eduardo Jorge wrote: > > > Why Qt 5.0 was not yet included in Rawhide/Fedora > 19? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=878188&hide_resolved=1 Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedo