On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Hunting for patents is one thing (I wouldn't recommend it either), but
looking for obviously patent-encumbered stuff (like MP3 codecs) is another
.
Unfortunately it is generally not obvious what things are obviously
drago01 wrote:
We have been shipping patented code in freetype for a while (until it
expired) we just disabled it at build time.
But this has never been compliant with Fedora Legal policies.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Eric Smith wrote:
IANAL, but multiple lawyers have told me that it is generally a bad idea
to go looking for patents, at least in the US. If they're brought to your
attention, you should probably do whatever is necessary to avoid them, but
you shouldn't actively seek them out, even just to
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Eric Smith wrote:
IANAL, but multiple lawyers have told me that it is generally a bad idea
to go looking for patents, at least in the US. If they're brought to your
attention, you should probably do whatever is necessary to avoid them, but
El jun 8, 2014 10:53 PM, Eric Smith space...@gmail.com escribió:
IANAL, but multiple lawyers have told me that it is generally a bad
idea to go looking for patents, at least in the US. If they're brought
to your attention, you should probably do whatever is necessary to avoid
them, but you
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Isaac Cortés González
w.isaac.cor...@gmail.com wrote:
So, should I just clone the git repositories and build from those raw
sources?
Sounds reasonable to me.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
So it's more a reason of manpower than any other thing. The question would
be: is there any to accomplish this task?
I can look for any patented or closed source software and if any of them
are critical to build the SDK and NDK. Also I'll ask to the Replicant
project for any hint/tip on this.
El
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Isaac Cortés González
w.isaac.cor...@gmail.com wrote:
I can look for any patented or closed source software
IANAL, but multiple lawyers have told me that it is generally a bad idea to
go looking for patents, at least in the US. If they're brought to your
drago01 wrote:
So I simply do not know whether the remove patented code from he
tarball is simply paranoia or there is really a legal reason for it.
I've been asked by fedora-legal to remove stuff from tarballs on multiple
occasions for this reason.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
Isaac Cortés González wrote:
But it is licensed under an Apache license, we can download the source and
build it ourselves.
Yes, please contact the Replicant folks for how to rebuild the Android SDK
from source. (Last I checked, they didn't document the procedure either, but
they should know
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Isaac Cortés González wrote:
But it is licensed under an Apache license, we can download the source and
build it ourselves.
Yes, please contact the Replicant folks for how to rebuild the Android SDK
from source. (Last
Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
The ripping things out of tarballs policy seems really weird to me.
It means, for example, that I can't compare the hash of the openssl
tarball to upstream's.
Is it really necessary? I understand that Fedora can't ship anything
infringes on a patent, but I had the
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
The ripping things out of tarballs policy seems really weird to me.
It means, for example, that I can't compare the hash of the openssl
tarball to upstream's.
Is it really necessary? I
But it is licensed under an Apache license, we can download the source and
build it ourselves.
-Isaac C.
2014-06-02 12:14 GMT-06:00 Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com
wrote:
After looking at the link you provided,
After looking at the link you provided, it's easy to see that we must
have Android SDK packaged which is non-free IMO.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
After looking at the link you provided, it's easy to see that we must
have Android SDK packaged which is non-free IMO.
It's plausible that Qt5 could be buildable against Replicant, though.
--Andy
--
devel mailing
I don't really know. I've been looking and in the download page, and
there's a package, named qtandroidextras-opensource-src-5.x.x.tar.XXX; but
there's that much explanation if it is the core for develop in android, or
addons to the core (the extras part in the name confuses me); then I
found this
Isaac Cortés González wrote:
This may be a repeated topic. But is there any effort to add to the repos
the packages of Qt to develop for Android? If there isn't how can I help?
What packages of Qt does this include?
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
This may be a repeated topic. But is there any effort to add to the repos
the packages of Qt to develop for Android? If there isn't how can I help?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
19 matches
Mail list logo
