On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:39:55PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said:
> > of those that it does open(),.. Is there seriously a use-case for someone
> > wanting
> > lvm partitioned /dev/ram disks ? or /dev/loop ?
>
> I would assume that's for testing.
point
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said:
> of those that it does open(),.. Is there seriously a use-case for someone
> wanting
> lvm partitioned /dev/ram disks ? or /dev/loop ?
I would assume that's for testing.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On Wed, 21.07.10 14:38, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > lvm is brain damaged. strace lvm pvscan, and watch as it opens a bunch
> > of stuff that there's no way there'd ever be a volume on.
> > /dev/snd/*, tty's, usbmon etc etc
>
> looking closer, it seems to be only stat'ing, instead
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 14:30 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:26:14PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 20.07.10 16:04, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
> >
> > > I am not entirely sure though why those processes actually access those
> > > dirs i
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:30:03PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:26:14PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 20.07.10 16:04, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
> >
> > > I am not entirely sure though why those processes actually access those
>
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:26:14PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 20.07.10 16:04, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
>
> > I am not entirely sure though why those processes actually access those
> > dirs in this case. Maybe they are iterating through the files in /dev
On Tue, 20.07.10 16:04, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
> I am not entirely sure though why those processes actually access those
> dirs in this case. Maybe they are iterating through the files in /dev?
> Smells a bit broken to me.
OK, the udevd is a result from /lib/udev/devices
On Mon, 19.07.10 13:52, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> I am noticing the following in F14
>
> type=1400 audit(1279559591.480:31): avc: denied { read } for pid=526
> comm="udevd" name="/" dev=autofs ino=9519
> scontext=system_u:system_r:udev_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> tcontext=system_u:obj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am noticing the following in F14
type=1400 audit(1279559591.480:31): avc: denied { read } for pid=526
comm="udevd" name="/" dev=autofs ino=9519
scontext=system_u:system_r:udev_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=system_u:object_r:autofs_t:s0 tclass=dir
typ
