Stefan Nuxoll wrote:
This is going to be pretty common for anything that uses the bootstrap CSS
framework, since glyphicons is bundled as part of it. I do not see much
benefit from packaging this separately
It is Fedora policy that packages MUST NOT bundle fonts and that they need
to use
On 2015-07-14, Stefan Nuxoll ste...@nuxoll.eu.org wrote:
This is going to be pretty common for anything that uses the bootstrap
CSS framework, since glyphicons is bundled as part of it. I do not see
much benefit from packaging this separately, especially as the license
for the glyphicons
On 14 July 2015 at 03:55, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
During the review of cppformat, it was pointed out that it contained a font
that should be removed because it's packaged with Fedora (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279#c3 ). While working on
resolving
that runs an application packaged in the collection?
Stefan Nuxoll ste...@nuxoll.eu.orgmailto:ste...@nuxoll.eu.org
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: ppi...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Packaged fonts? (and regular audits?)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:07:15
This is going to be pretty common for anything that uses the bootstrap CSS
framework, since glyphicons is bundled as part of it. I do not see much benefit
from packaging this separately, especially as the license for the glyphicons
halflings font included with bootstrap is MIT, but CC-BY from
