Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

2018-08-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2018-08-28 16:58, Vít Ondruch a écrit : Just FTR, the logic is more or less there. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bootstrapping https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/789 together with: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/pull-request/7 I hadn't se

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

2018-08-28 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 28.8.2018 v 13:47 Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a): > Le 2018-08-07 17:33, Adam Jackson a écrit : >> Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it >> might load to be installed. But when building an application, you just >> need the library itself. If the drivers themselves have

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

2018-08-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2018-08-28 15:27, Adam Jackson a écrit : On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 13:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le 2018-08-07 17:33, Adam Jackson a écrit : > Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it > might load to be installed. But when building an application, you just > need t

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

2018-08-28 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 13:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-08-07 17:33, Adam Jackson a écrit : > > Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it > > might load to be installed. But when building an application, you just > > need the library itself. If the drivers thems

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

2018-08-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2018-08-07 17:33, Adam Jackson a écrit : Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it might load to be installed. But when building an application, you just need the library itself. If the drivers themselves have non-trivial dependencies, the buildroot is more likely to f

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

2018-08-07 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 18:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > In my point of view, in opencv package , sdk should require -devel not > the inverse I'm not so much concerned with the _names_ of the subpackages, as with the idea of packaging the same files in multiple packages and being careful with

Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

2018-08-07 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 11:33 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it > might load to be installed. But when building an application, you > just > need the library itself. If the drivers themselves have non-trivial > dependencies, the buildroot

RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

2018-08-07 Thread Adam Jackson
Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it might load to be installed. But when building an application, you just need the library itself. If the drivers themselves have non-trivial dependencies, the buildroot is more likely to fail to compose. The problem, in a sense, is t