On Sun, 1 Mar 2015 23:28:48 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
I do use it from time to time, but I'm currently on F21.
Me too, but the Copr builds of 3.6 feature a repo for F21, too.
The Qt UI is not a port, but more of a rewrite/redesign. Various dialogs
look very different.
I'd
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:20:07 +1100, Dan Fruehauf wrote:
Is it possible to compile audacious on its own and then supply gtk3 and qt
packages on top of it?
No. First of all, Qt has always been more than a GUI-library. It's a C++
development framework, and Audacious' core libs will likely use it
Michael,
Thanks for sharing that.
I think it'd be the best to go with the flow. That is, use the QT GUI. In
the long run I think it is best to avoid maintaining multiple packages. I
haven't seen the new QT GUI to be honest, it might be ugly, but still :)
Perhaps if there is too much rage about
Hi,
On Sunday, 01 March 2015 at 15:45, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Audacious 3.6 has been released.
This is another chance for interested people to join and help deciding how
to proceed with the Fedora packages. I'm still looking for co-maintainers,
too, especially some who have an opinion on
Audacious 3.6 has been released.
This is another chance for interested people to join and help deciding how
to proceed with the Fedora packages. I'm still looking for co-maintainers,
too, especially some who have an opinion on how to package it.
I've been building pre-releases for it via Fedora
