OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250905.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250906.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 58.89 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Fri, 2025-09-05 at 15:16 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 06:32:44 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> > OK, so I missed a bunch of packages where action is required. This is
> > why it's better to work in rawhide first. Do as I say, no
On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 06:32:44 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
OK, so I missed a bunch of packages where action is required. This is
why it's better to work in rawhide first. Do as I say, not as I do. I
think the path of least resistance here is for me to add Provides in
additi
Let's do it.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https:/
On Fri, 2025-09-05 at 16:53 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 02:30:43 PM -07:00:00, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > Are there not Obsoletes: in place? If not, how is this expected to
> > work
> > for GNOME users on upgrade?
>
> There are a bunch of Obsoletes, but not for the
On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 02:30:43 PM -07:00:00, Adam Williamson
wrote:
Are there not Obsoletes: in place? If not, how is this expected to
work
for GNOME users on upgrade?
There are a bunch of Obsoletes, but not for the thumbnailer.
Unfortunately the gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer is not its own subpack
On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 08:20:26 AM -07:00:00, Adam Williamson
wrote:
Sure it is? It's line 12 of gnome-mines.spec.
Hm. Whatever I was looking at, it definitely was not gnome-mines.spec.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
, so I missed a bunch of packages where action is required. This is
why it's better to work in rawhide first. Do as I say, not as I do. I
think the path of least resistance here is for me to add Provides in
addition to the Obsoletes, so we don't have to run around trying to
drop the
On Fri, 2025-09-05 at 07:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 12:51:52 AM -07:00:00, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > rmdepcheck unearthed something else that's apparently affected by the
> > F44 megaupdate:
> >
> > package: gnome-mines-48.1-2.fc43.x86_64 from
> > https://kojip
Neal Gompa wrote:
> glycin/gdk2-pixbuf based thumbnailing is only present in GNOME and its
> derivatives, so I'm not sure that's an appropriate change.
That is strictly speaking correct, I'm also not sure who else uses
/ush/share/thumbnailers...
If really needed, another streamlining alternative
On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 2:41 PM Miloš Komarčević wrote:
>
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > I'll investigate libheif. Hopefully it will be easy to submit a pull
> > request. Didn't know about that one.
>
> Should be, there is also a similar CMake option to skip the
> heif-pixbuf-loader.
>
> The heif-
Thanks for responding quickly.
On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 03:05:11 AM -05:00:00, Benjamin Gilbert
wrote:
One option is to remove all loaders from gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra
except XPM, at least in Rawhide.
I recommend doing this. Then we can see if anybody complains about the
other missing
till need it. (Also, it'd
be nice to not break random old local binaries that crash if they can't
load their application icon.)
Since the gdk-pixbuf thumbnailer is going away, the risk of drive-by
downloads seems low(er). One option is to remove all loaders
from gdk-pixbuf2-modules-ext
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 02:41:17 PM -07:00:00, Adam Williamson
wrote:
Not sure what's going on there, but since you mentioned thumbnailing
it
triggered my memory...
Most likely will be fixed by this gdk-pixbuf2 update. At least, I sure
hope so. PNG thumbnailing is working fine for me.
The in
On Thu, 2025-09-04 at 08:51 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you are CCed on this mail, then action is required (mat2) or
> recommended (libavif, jpegxl, gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra,
> webp-pixbuf-loader).
rmdepcheck unearthed something else that's apparently affected by the
F44 megau
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Proposed https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libavif/pull-request/10 and
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jpegxl/pull-request/13
Please do the same for libheif as well, changes are analogous to libavif.
--
___
devel mailin
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 08:51:36 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
For libavif/jpegxl, my recommendation is review the build flags to
disable building the gdk-pixbuf support, and remove the subpackages
that provide the pixbuf loaders.
Proposed https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libavif/pul
On Thu, 2025-09-04 at 08:51 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> First, gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer will no longer be built. It is currently
> broken in F43 and upstream recommends that we stop building it
> altogether. It is obsoleted by glycin-thumbnailer, which works well.
> (Although jxl support see
On Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:51:36 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I have checked our gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra package. I think the
> BMP, ICO, PNM, and TGA loaders are now obsolete and can safely be
> disabled. The other loaders provided by this package are still
> needed, but they cover particularl
There is one more problem. Third-party thumbnailers under
/usr/share/thumbnailers that use gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer don't work
anymore (and are no longer necessary). We should remove them from
libavif, librsvg, and jpegxl.
--
___
devel mailing list
libprometheus-cpp-devel` on rawhide.)
The EPEL packages will remain, for use by nfs-ganesha packages in the
CentOS Storage SIG.
--
Kaleb
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 11:47:45 AM -04:00:00, Yaakov Selkowitz
wrote:
Could glycin add XPM support? Or could the GdkPixbuf XPM loader be
rewritten to use libXpm instead?
I will ask Glycin upstream about XPM, but it's pretty obsolete so I
wouldn't be surprised if the answer is "stop using XPM.
On 9/4/25 11:28, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 08:51:36 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
I have checked our gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra package. I think the BMP,
ICO, PNM, and TGA loaders are now obsolete and can safely be disabled.
The other loaders provided by this packa
On Thu, Sep 4 2025 at 08:51:36 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
I have checked our gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra package. I think the
BMP, ICO, PNM, and TGA loaders are now obsolete and can safely be
disabled. The other loaders provided by this package are still
needed, but they cover partic
Hi,
If you are CCed on this mail, then action is required (mat2) or
recommended (libavif, jpegxl, gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra,
webp-pixbuf-loader).
I propose some *mildly* disruptive changes for the gdk-pixbuf2 package
in rawhide and also F43. (I was tempted to do this only in rawhide, but
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 1:53 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> a new dracut version 108 [1] will soon land in Fedora Rawhide. Please let me
> know if you encounter any problems.
>
> In case you are eager to test it right now you can use COPR or a scratch
> build pos
Hello,
a new dracut version 108 [1] will soon land in Fedora Rawhide. Please let
me know if you encounter any problems.
In case you are eager to test it right now you can use COPR or a scratch
build posted in the source-git PR [2].
[1] https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/releases/tag/108
[2
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250902.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250903.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:42
Upgraded packages: 166
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 7.19 MiB
Size of dropped packages
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250901.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250902.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 431.38 KiB
Size of dropped packages
In one week, 2025-09-08, or slightly later, I plan to update abseil-cpp
from 20250512.1 to 20250814.0 (Abseil LTS branch, August 2025)[1] in a
side tag for F44/Rawhide. I plan to do the same update for F43/Branched
as well, but I intend to wait until the Beta Freeze is over in order to
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250831.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250901.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 42
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 35.12 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250830.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250831.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:49.81 MiB
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250829.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250830.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 16
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:129.37
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250829.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250829.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 55
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 416.42 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250828.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250829.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 10
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 43
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250827.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250828.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 136
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250826.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250827.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:22
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:14
Upgraded packages: 10
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:11.35
Hi,
Fresh builds of of pre-release systemd have been pushed for rawhide
and f43. systemd-258~rc3-2.fc44 is the first 258-rc version that made
it past gating. The release was delayed and is very large. See
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/systemd/systemd/v258-rc1/NEWS
for a long list of changes
The update has been submitted. Hopefully will be available in stable soon.
On 8/22/25 07:41, Orion Poplawski wrote:
This has now started in f44-build-side-117375
On 8/7/25 17:56, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm planning on updating:
netcdf to 4.9.3
libharu to 2.4.5
vtk to 9.3.1
These are soname
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250823.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250824.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 62
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.60 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250822.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250823.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 53
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 183.43 KiB
Size of dropped packages
This has now started in f44-build-side-117375
On 8/7/25 17:56, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm planning on updating:
netcdf to 4.9.3
libharu to 2.4.5
vtk to 9.3.1
These are soname updates and they and dependencies will be built in the
side tag f43-build-side-116314
I'm planning on starting Frida
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250821.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250822.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:11
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:37
Upgraded packages: 89
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.40 GiB
Size of dropped packages
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250820.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250821.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 9
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 65
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 61.78 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello,
On 8/14/25 11:29 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
I just wanted to give a heads up that
nfs-utils (in the near future) will be broken
up into the following sub packages with
new dependencies. Rawhide Only!
* nfs-common-utils - Common utilities for both server and clients
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250819.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250820.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:377
Upgraded packages: 95
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 581.92 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 11:29:04AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just wanted to give a heads up that
> nfs-utils (in the near future) will be broken
> up into the following sub packages with
> new dependencies. Rawhide Only!
>
> * nfs-common-utils - C
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250818.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250819.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 157
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 45.77 MiB
Size of dropped packages
This is now done.
Sandro
On 17.08.25 23:39, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to build assimp-6.0.2 which carries a soname bump, for
rawhide and F43 in respective side tags the coming days, and I'll also
rebuild the following dependent packages:
f3d
pioneer
qt5-qt3d
qt6-qtquic
Hi
I'm planning to build assimp-6.0.2 which carries a soname bump, for
rawhide and F43 in respective side tags the coming days, and I'll also
rebuild the following dependent packages:
f3d
pioneer
qt5-qt3d
qt6-qtquick3d
vkmark
Tha
Hey folks,
I've just submitted a bodhi update for Rawhide, [0]
bumping fpc (Free Pascal Compiler) to 3.2.4~rc1. [1]
I've performed a test rebuild of all dependent packages in COPR.
There have been some failures, but patching them turned out to be
quite easy. I opened PRs against all th
probably be the last package I build.
Please check with me before you start building it for tinyxml2.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 8:33 AM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> In one week, 2025-08-23, I plan to update the tinyxml2 package from 10.0.0 to
> 11.0.0[1] in F43/Branched and F44/Rawhide. This
In one week, 2025-08-23, I plan to update the tinyxml2 package from
10.0.0 to 11.0.0[1] in F43/Branched and F44/Rawhide. This is an
ABI-incompatible update that bumps the SONAME version from 10 to 11. An
impact check in COPR[2] revealed no regressions. This update will fix
CVE-2024-50614, and
On 16. 08. 25 0:45, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Just a heads up that gdal will also need a rebuild for mingw-icu, but that
should wait until this side tag lands.
gdal and libarrow also need a rebuild for Python 3.14.0rc2:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/t
Just a heads up that gdal will also need a rebuild for mingw-icu, but
that should wait until this side tag lands.
Though with the issue with libarrow itself below, I'm worried that this
might take a bit.
If gdal does get rebuilt in rawhide, I suppose it could just get rebuilt
in the
The root build
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=136012898) fails with:
In file included from
/builddir/build/BUILD/root-6.36.02-build/root-6.36.02/tree/dataframe/src/RArrowDS.cxx:45:
/usr/include/arrow/stl.h:35:10: fatal error: arrow/compute/api.h: No
such file or directory
I see a commit message with a reference to building in the side tag for
'root' but no actual build of 'root' in the side tag.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:07 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I have kicked off rebuilds of gdal, groonga, and root after running:
>
> koji wait-repo f44-build-side-116633 --b
groonga either needs to be updated to 15.1.4 [1] or merge my PR[2]
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/groonga/pull-request/24
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/groonga/pull-request/25
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:07 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I have kicked off rebuilds of gdal, groonga,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250813.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250815.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 239
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.14 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello,
I just wanted to give a heads up that
nfs-utils (in the near future) will be broken
up into the following sub packages with
new dependencies. Rawhide Only!
* nfs-common-utils - Common utilities for both server and clients
* nfsv3-client-utils - NFSv3 client
* nfs-common
Hi all,
As part of the Fedora 43 mass branching, bodhi updates that were
intended to land in Fedora Rawhide but which were prevented from
landing there due to failed gating tests were unpushed.
This is because these updates will require manual intervention to land
correctly, i.e. new builds for
Thank you so much for taking care of this and diving that deep into the
issue Mamoru! <3
This is what I love Open Source Communities and in particular the Fedora
Community for.
I wouldn't have managed to get that worked out beneath my usual work and
childcare.
Regards <3
Dominic
On Thu, Aug 14,
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2025/08/13 23:41:
Dan Horák wrote on 2025/08/13 19:29:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 12:14:16 +0200
Dominic Hopf via devel wrote:
Greetings,
I'm currently trying to take care of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385207 but get stuck in
understanding what happened here
I have kicked off rebuilds of gdal, groonga, and root after running:
koji wait-repo f44-build-side-116633 --build=libarrow-21.0.0-1.fc44
--request
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=136012882
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=136012897
https://koji.fedoraproj
liborc and libarrow packages are now built in the side tag and dependent
package builds can be started.
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 4:39 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 8/12/25 13:34, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> >
> > Now that f43 has branched I will be updating:
> > ceph to ceph 20 (tentacle)
Dan Horák wrote on 2025/08/13 19:29:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 12:14:16 +0200
Dominic Hopf via devel wrote:
Greetings,
I'm currently trying to take care of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385207 but get stuck in
understanding what happened here as the package itself got its last update
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250813.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250813.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 16
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 12:14:16 +0200
Dominic Hopf via devel wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm currently trying to take care of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385207 but get stuck in
> understanding what happened here as the package itself got its last update
> on 2024-10-28. Since then t
Greetings,
I'm currently trying to take care of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385207 but get stuck in
understanding what happened here as the package itself got its last update
on 2024-10-28. Since then there only were (Mass)? Rebuilds for the package.
Basic error message is, that
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250812.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250813.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 20
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250812.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250812.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 86
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 62.40 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On 8/12/25 13:34, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> Now that f43 has branched I will be updating:
> ceph to ceph 20 (tentacle)
> libarrow to arrow-21.0.0, includes SONAME bump
> liborc to orc-2.2.0, includes SONAME bump
>
> side-tag f44-build-side-116633 has been created for the purpose of building
Now that f43 has branched I will be updating:
ceph to ceph 20 (tentacle)
libarrow to arrow-21.0.0, includes SONAME bump
liborc to orc-2.2.0, includes SONAME bump
side-tag f44-build-side-116633 has been created for the purpose of building
these and the dependent packages.
I believe the packa
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250811.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250812.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:25
Upgraded packages: 168
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 86.88 MiB
Size of dropped packages
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250810.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250811.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Hi list,
Long story short: xkeyboard-config 2.45 has changed the install location
of XKB data files after a few decades of a single (often hardcoded)
path. The new path is /usr/share/xkeyboard-config-2 and the old path
/usr/share/X11/xkb is a symlink to the new path.
RPM isn't happy with replacin
libharu update has now been merged.
On 8/9/25 16:40, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Plans have changed a bit. I'm not ready for the netcdf/vtk update so
I'm going to just go ahead to do the libharu update now. It is starting
to build in the side tag. Will be building deps after that.
I do still pl
Great! Yeah, I hope the deps can handle Qt6. AFAICT pcl-tools and python3-vtk
are the only Fedora packages depending on the vtk-qt libraries.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250809.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250810.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 331
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 1.67 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250810.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 8/9/25 17:16, Matthew Krupcale wrote:
Hey Orion,
Thanks for working on these updates. Are there any plans to move vtk-qt to
build against Qt6? It looks like pcl supports Qt6 [1,2], and more software is
starting to support Qt6 now.
Best,
Matthew
[1] https://github.com/PointCloudLibrary/pcl
Hey Orion,
Thanks for working on these updates. Are there any plans to move vtk-qt to
build against Qt6? It looks like pcl supports Qt6 [1,2], and more software is
starting to support Qt6 now.
Best,
Matthew
[1] https://github.com/PointCloudLibrary/pcl/pull/4969
[2] https://github.com/PointClou
Plans have changed a bit. I'm not ready for the netcdf/vtk update so
I'm going to just go ahead to do the libharu update now. It is starting
to build in the side tag. Will be building deps after that.
I do still plan to get the netcdf/vtk update into F43 if possible - but
vtk is a beast to
ke an update to a git snapshot of
rpmdevtools was pushed to dist-git but never built - except during the
mass rebuild.
And apparently the changes since the last release contain the
regression reported here.
I have now pushed a revert back to the previously "last known good"
version t
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250808.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250809.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 59.73 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250807.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250808.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 220
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.51 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
I'm planning on updating:
netcdf to 4.9.3
libharu to 2.4.5
vtk to 9.3.1
These are soname updates and they and dependencies will be built in the
side tag f43-build-side-116314
I'm planning on starting Friday (tomorrow) or Saturday.
Dependent packages:
netcdf:
GMT
LabPlot
R-ncdf4
bout++
dx
ec
Update is complete:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-34fd8cb194
I also realized that I mistyped the version - it is 10.2.0
On 8/7/25 10:04, Orion Poplawski wrote:
This is starting shortly in f43-build-side-116288
On 8/1/25 20:44, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Deps will be rebuilt
It silently fails to detect the use of rpmautospec and updates the spec
anyway. See https://pagure.io/rpmdevtools/issue/128
This caused me a bunch of grief today with the octave update.
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250806.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250807.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 25
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 208
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 53.18 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Update has landed to rawhide!
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 8:56 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 4:45 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 6 2025 at 04:34:43 PM +02:00:00, Frantisek Zatloukal
>> wrote:
>> > Remaining builds
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250807.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
This is starting shortly in f43-build-side-116288
On 8/1/25 20:44, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Deps will be rebuilt in a side tag. This involves an ABI and octave
module api update.
libsvm
mathgl
mmc
mpsolve
NLopt
octave-brain2mesh
octave-communications
octave-control
octave-dicom
octave-doctest
o
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 4:45 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6 2025 at 04:34:43 PM +02:00:00, Frantisek Zatloukal
> wrote:
> > Remaining builds (mozjs*) will be fixed and addressed post side
> > merging,
>
> But gnome-shell depends on mozjs. Won't this break the entire desktop?
>
It's
On Fri, 2025-08-01 at 16:13 +0200, Tomi Lähteenmäki wrote:
> Chatty is now built too.
Hi,
all of the dependents are built now, thus I filled an update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-52eba2eead
Thank you for helping with the rebuilds.
Bye,
Milan
--
On Wed, Aug 6 2025 at 04:34:43 PM +02:00:00, Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
Remaining builds (mozjs*) will be fixed and addressed post side
merging,
But gnome-shell depends on mozjs. Won't this break the entire desktop?
--
___
devel mailing list -- dev
Update is now queued for rawhide:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-bd5d800907
Remaining builds (mozjs*) will be fixed and addressed post side merging,
--
Best regards / S pozdravem,
František Zatloukal
Senior Quality Engineer
Red Hat
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250805.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250806.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 109
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 396.79 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sat, Aug 2 2025 at 03:11:46 PM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
It just so happens that I was about to start building a new WebKit
update anyway (update to 2.49.4). I will use your side tag.
Done.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250804.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250805.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 84
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.69 MiB
Size of dropped packages
1 - 100 of 11711 matches
Mail list logo
