On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 22:58 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 22:55:21 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
This would make sense for non cloud images as well. Is there any
reason why we have to
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 07:38:29PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Somewhere to start, mostly. I'd love to see it extend across the project.
It would be very useful for ARM images too.
Cool. Maybe we could get some of the ARM people working with the cloud SIG
to come up with the initial plan? See
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 07:38:29PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Somewhere to start, mostly. I'd love to see it extend across the project.
It would be very useful for ARM images too.
Cool. Maybe we could get some
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:55:21PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
This would make sense for non cloud images as well. Is there any
reason why we have to restrict that to the cloud?
Somewhere to start, mostly. I'd love to
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:19:37 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
We need to be able to produce official updates to the Fedora Cloud
images. Initially, we plan to release these updates monthly, but also
need the ability to release an out-of-cycle update in the event of a
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:07:47AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Might be good to specify better what a 'severe security issue' is.
Perhaps Any update rated important or higher on the severity scale?
https://access.redhat.com/site/security/updates/classification/
Yeah, that needs to be worked
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:08:34 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:07:47AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Might be good to specify better what a 'severe security issue' is.
Perhaps Any update rated important or higher on the severity
scale?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:08:34 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:07:47AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Might be good to specify better what a 'severe security issue' is.
Perhaps
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 22:55:21 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
This would make sense for non cloud images as well. Is there any
reason why we have to restrict that to the cloud?
QA resource limits.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 22:55:21 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
This would make sense for non cloud images as well. Is there any
reason why we have to restrict that to the cloud?
QA resource limits.
The
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:55:21PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
This would make sense for non cloud images as well. Is there any
reason why we have to restrict that to the cloud?
Somewhere to start, mostly. I'd love to see it extend across the project.
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 16:19:37 +0200,
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: (A)Periodic Updates to Images =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/%28A%29Periodic_Updates_to_Images
Is this perodic updates to just cloud images? If so the title of the
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:51:46AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: (A)Periodic Updates to Images =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/%28A%29Periodic_Updates_to_Images
Is this perodic updates to just cloud images? If so the title of the
change should probably
13 matches
Mail list logo
