On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:13:25 -0500
Adam Jackson wrote:
> But prevention of DoS on the part of local actors is just not a game you
> can win. If nothing else, remember that the way Linux implements
> malloc() assumes you have infinite memory, which means you overcommit
> resources, which means fa
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 16:13 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:10 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > (And of course what we're doing here is protecting against a malicious
> > > attacker who already has enough privileges
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/05/2011 04:38 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> But prevention of DoS on the part of local actors is just not a game you
>> can win. If nothing else, remember that the way Linux implements
>> ma
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> But prevention of DoS on the part of local actors is just not a game you
> can win. If nothing else, remember that the way Linux implements
> malloc() assumes you have infinite memory, which means you overcommit
> resources, which means failur
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:10 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > (And of course what we're doing here is protecting against a malicious
> > attacker who already has enough privileges to run code on your system,
> > which means you're pretty far i
