Re: Review Swap - some python, others

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 02:25:17PM -0400, Neil Hanlon wrote: > tinyows - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307815 I took this one. Please https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2311104 in exchange. Zbyszek -- ___ devel mailing list -- d

Re: Review Swap - some python, others

On 2024-09-11 14:25, Neil Hanlon wrote: wyrd - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269316 I've reviewed your wyrd package. It looks good. I'm happy to take any reviews from others in return. Please review my accel-ppp package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309760

Re: review swap: aactivator (Python)

Am 08.08.24 um 13:25 schrieb Peter Lemenkov: Sure, I still have a few Python packages sitting in my queue. maybe you can have a look at this one if you have time: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303756 Felix -- ___ devel mailing list --

Re: review swap: aactivator (Python)

Thank you very much Felix! On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 9:46 AM Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > Am 05.08.24 um 20:16 schrieb Peter Lemenkov: > > I've just reviewed it. Could you please pick any of these Python > > packages and review it? All these packages are quite straightforward. > > > > * ht

Re: review swap: aactivator (Python)

Hi Peter, Am 05.08.24 um 20:16 schrieb Peter Lemenkov: I've just reviewed it. Could you please pick any of these Python packages and review it? All these packages are quite straightforward. * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2302539 - python-lazy_load - A minimalistic interface that allows lazy eval

Re: review swap: aactivator (Python)

Hey! On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 9:44 PM Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > thanks for the review, I'll check your packages later. > > Am 05.08.24 um 20:16 schrieb Peter Lemenkov: > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2302731 - python-baseconv - A basic > > baseconv implementation in python > > non-ex

Re: review swap: aactivator (Python)

Hi Peter, thanks for the review, I'll check your packages later. Am 05.08.24 um 20:16 schrieb Peter Lemenkov: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2302731 - python-baseconv - A basic baseconv implementation in python non-existing github repo? https://github.com/semente/baseconv * https://bugzilla.

Re: review swap: aactivator (Python)

Hey. I've just reviewed it. Could you please pick any of these Python packages and review it? All these packages are quite straightforward. * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2302539 - python-lazy_load - A minimalistic interface that allows lazy evaluation * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2302731 - python

Re: Review swap / python

> Hey, I'll review web-eid in coming week. > Could you take a look at python-ownet review? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256125 Sure! Thank you very much -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Review swap / python

On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 05:23:57PM -, Germano Massullo wrote: > > Bug 2246454 - Review Request: python-pyxlsb2 - Excel 2007+ Binary Workbook > > (xlsb) parser > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246454 > > I will take this one. > Can you please review this package? > web-eid - We

Re: Review swap / python

Ops I did not notice that python-pyxlsb2 review was already taken care by another person -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs

Re: Review swap / python

> Bug 2246454 - Review Request: python-pyxlsb2 - Excel 2007+ Binary Workbook > (xlsb) parser > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246454 I will take this one. Can you please review this package? web-eid - Web eID browser extension helper application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.

Re: Review swap / python

Dne 31. 07. 24 v 11:50 odp. Michal Ambroz napsal(a): *# Bug 2246704 - Review Request: python-xlrd2 - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel legacy spreadsheet files *(xls) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246704 I take this. If you can do review of https://bugzilla.redhat

Re: Review swap

Isn't the wasi-sdk just umbrella project? Is it really needed? We have llvm / clang, we have wasi-libc, what else do you need? Vít Dne 06. 03. 24 v 11:08 Jan Horak napsal(a): Hi, if anyone is willing to make a review for wasi-sdk - build require for the Firefox rlbox sandboxing of the used

Re: Review swap Bottles dependencies

On 22-04-2023 14:36, Sandro wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a review for a couple of Bottles dependencies. 1. python-fvs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 2. vkbasalt-cli https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188653 Both are Python packages and I'll be happy to do reviews i

Re: review swap

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 02:40:13PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:36 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189633 > > Review Request: mkosi-initrd - Generator for initrd images using distro > > packa

Re: review swap

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:36 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > I have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189633 > Review Request: mkosi-initrd - Generator for initrd images using distro > packages > The packaging is trivial, there isn't even a %build section. > This is

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:45:08PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > On 1/11/23 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 > >> > >> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

On 1/11/23 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 >> >> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity. >> >> This package / review bug has been extensively r

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:42 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 > > > > I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity. > > > > This package / review bug

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 > > I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity. > > This package / review bug has been extensively reviewed -- 87 comments(!!) > on the review alread

Re: Review swap

On 12/29/22 22:32, TI_Eugene wrote: > Can review something against my new package - QCustomPlot/PyQt > binding: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156080 > > Qt and/or python packages are preferable, but not exactly. > > ___ Taken __

Re: Review swap for python-plotnine and dependencies

On 17-10-2022 18:36, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 17. 10. 22 15:15, Sandro wrote: Hi, I have submitted reviews for python-plotnine and its dependencies: python-plotnine   python-scikit-misc   python-adjustText   pythn-mizani   python-palettable Could you please share t

Re: Review swap for python-plotnine and dependencies

On 17. 10. 22 15:15, Sandro wrote: Hi, I have submitted reviews for python-plotnine and its dependencies: python-plotnine   python-scikit-misc   python-adjustText   pythn-mizani   python-palettable Could you please share the links? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +42077797

Re: Review swap for pf-bb-config

On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 5:08 PM Timothy Redaelli wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for reviews or review swap for pf-bb-config: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101769 > > The spec file is straightforward, so it should be > trivial to review it. > > I'd be happy to review packages in e

Re: Review swap : blueprint-compiler

Thanks! Happy to do it :)! Le 21/08/2022 à 19:56, Jonathan Wright via devel a écrit : I'm happy to trade for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118887 On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:03 PM Lyes Saadi

Re: Review swap : blueprint-compiler

I'm happy to trade for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118887 On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:03 PM Lyes Saadi wrote: > Hello devel! > > I have new dependency I need to update dialect to 2.0. It's been waiting > since july, so I'm proposing a review swap. It's the python/meson > guideline

Re: Review swap - python-specfile

On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 13:46 -0500, Ken Dreyer wrote: > Your email made me look at this upstream > (https://github.com/packit/specfile). It looks interesting! I wonder > if we could use it more broadly (like for pyrpkg). It reminds me of > https://github.com/containerbuildsystem/dockerfile-parse . >

Re: Review swap - python-specfile

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:09 AM Nikola Forró wrote: > Hello, > > is there anybody willing to review python-specfile [1]? Your email made me look at this upstream (https://github.com/packit/specfile). It looks interesting! I wonder if we could use it more broadly (like for pyrpkg). It reminds me o

Re: Review swap

I can take this Can you take https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2041042 in exchange? Thanks Sandro On 15.01.22 14:25, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Is anyone available for a review swap? I've got https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038675 waiting in the queue, I c

Re: Review swap

On 17.12.21 15:31, Jarek Prokop wrote: Hi, I have a few rubygem packages that need a (re-)review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010263 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010313 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010350 I'll take t

Re: Review swap

On 02.10.21 19:40, Jerry James wrote: The python-pydata-sphinx-theme package has a new dependency. I need a review for this simple python package: python-sphinx-sitemap:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009987 Who would like to swap reviews? I'll take it. I've currently got up fo

Re: [NeuroFedora-bugs] Re: Review swap: python-pathos (required to update python-SALib)

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 09:38:44 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pathos > > reviewed. It is required to update python-SALib to the latest rel

Re: Review swap: python-pathos (required to update python-SALib)

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pathos > reviewed. It is required to update python-SALib to the latest release > (and fix its FTI/FTBFS). > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2

Re: Review swap: fluent-bit

On Fri, 2021-07-09 at 08:04 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 7:54 AM Benjamin Kircher > wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980723 > > > > Fluent Bit is a high performance and multi-platform log forwarder: > > https://github.com/fluent/fluent-bit. It is w

Re: Review swap: fluent-bit

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 7:54 AM Benjamin Kircher wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980723 > > Fluent Bit is a high performance and multi-platform log forwarder: > https://github.com/fluent/fluent-bit. It is written in C++ and uses > CMake as build system. > > Happy to do revie

Re: Review swap: newsboat rust dependencies

Hi, Jerry James wrote: > I took them all. Thanks! Your OCaml packages should now be also reviewed, althoug Dan has beaten me to #1927441 :) -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Review swap: newsboat rust dependencies

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:44 AM Jan Staněk wrote: > I maintain newsboat [1], which in the latest version(s) grew new rust > dependencies. I have prepared a review request for all of them, > and I'm willing to review other packages in return. > > The reviews are the following bugs: > 1927183, 19272

Re: Review swap: voikko-fi (for Finnish spell-checking)

Hi all, This work is finally done and the packages are in Rawhide, in good time before the beta. Thank you Miro and Zbyszek! I think I found a fedpkg import bug while importing voikko-fi from SRPM, I'll make a new thread about that. -Ville-Pekka ___ dev

Re: Review swap: voikko-fi (for Finnish spell-checking)

On 24. 01. 21 19:43, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote: Hi, This is a re-review for a rename and going from arch-specific to noarch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919688 The arch-noarch stuff was discussed here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/t

Re: Review swap

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:40 AM Jared K. Smith wrote: > I'll review it. I don't need any reviews done in return at this moment. Thank you, Jared! Please let me know when you do need a review. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing

Re: Review swap

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:13 AM Jerry James wrote: > MuseScore 3.6 is out, and adds a dependency on another font. Who > would like to swap reviews? I need this one: > I'll review it. I don't need any reviews done in return at this moment. -Jared _

Re: Review swap

On Friday, 06 November 2020 at 00:06, Jerry James wrote: > Have you ever thought, "I wish Fedora had a command line utility where > I could type in an ASCII representation of the state of a Rubiks cube > and have it print an equally hard to read ASCII representation of the > moves needed to solve t

Re: Review swap: wlr-sunclock - Show the sun's shadows on earth (for wayland)

Thanks Carson, I'm up for that ... See you in bugzilla ... Cheers Bob On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 13:01, Carson Black wrote: > > Ello, > > The review process is documented on the wiki here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > In short, set the fedora-review flag on the bug

Re: Review swap: wlr-sunclock - Show the sun's shadows on earth (for wayland)

Ello, The review process is documented on the wiki here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process In short, set the fedora-review flag on the bug to ? when you're reviewing a package. When you approve a package, change the flag to +. I'll take this review swap. In return, I'd appreci

Re: Review swap

On Saturday, 4 July 2020 15:09:06 CEST Chenxiong Qi wrote: > Hi, > > Could anyone please review the package python-json? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853829 > > Thanks! > A few minor things to fix and you're good to go. ___ devel

Re: Review swap

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:12 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Done, no swap needed for now. Thank you! Let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Review swap

On Friday, 19 June 2020 18:28:43 CEST Jerry James wrote: > Alt-ergo 2.2.0 has been released under a public license. It has a new > dependency, however. Would someone like to swap reviews? I need this > one: > > ocaml-psmt2-frontend: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847772 > > Thank

Re: Review swap - antimicroX

Hello Greg, I'll take it. Could you please review this in return? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844643 I'll start working on it in a few hours. Best regards ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

NeuroFedora (re)review swap: un-retiring maven-jaxb2-plugin

Hello, I need the maven-jaxb2-plugin package to build a NeuroFedora package. So, I'd like to unretire it. Could someone (re)review it please? Always happy to swap reviews if anyone is looking for a reviewer too. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maven-jaxb2-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

Re: Review swap: psi-notify

Michel Alexandre Salim writes: > Would anyone like to swap a review? > > psi-notify - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832623 Looks simple enough, I'll try to review it today. If I don't manage to, anyone else can take the review. ___ devel

Re: Review Swap: bowtie2 - A read aligner for genome sequencing

On 4/22/20 9:55 PM, Jun Aruga wrote: Hi, Could anyone swap the review? Review Request: bowtie2 - A read aligner for genome sequencing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824348 I can take it. bowtie2 [1] is C++ software for genome analysis.It can be also used for COVID-19 analysis

Re: Review swap: freeopcua

Here's mine: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826326 I have to run a quick errand and afterwards I'll pick up the review for freeopcua. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.

Re: Review swap: freeopcua

Hello Till, I've taken it, and a have a simple gnome-shell extension I would like reviewed in return. I'm currently working with upstream on a bug, once that's solved I'll work on the freeopuca review. Best regards, A. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@li

Re: Review swap

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 8:39 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I can look at it later today. I'll also check if I have a pending package > review for you :) Thank you, Fabio! This will help me finally get rid of all the broken deps reports for the coq stack. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _

Re: Review swap

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 15:32 Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 8:00 PM Jerry James wrote: > > I have one more review I would like to swap with somebody. This is > > one of the last 2 packages I need to be able to update the coq stack. > > The other is already under review. Who needs

Re: Review swap

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 8:00 PM Jerry James wrote: > I have one more review I would like to swap with somebody. This is > one of the last 2 packages I need to be able to update the coq stack. > The other is already under review. Who needs a review? > > ocaml-ppx-deriving-yojson: https://bugzilla

Re: Review swap

On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jos de Kloe wrote: > I hope someone is interested to swap reviews? > I would like to package the python3 bindings to the eccodes package that > I maintain, which has been split to a separate repository by upstream. > See my review request here: > https://bugzilla.re

Re: Review Swap

Hi Mattia, Sure. That is fine. I will fix all the comments from Artur on my review request. Thanks! Yongkui On 3/14/20, 12:39 PM, "Mattia Verga via devel" wrote: Il 14/03/20 15:13, Yongkui Han (yonhan) ha scritto: > Hi Mattia, > > I would like to swap review with you, howe

Re: Review Swap

Hi Mattia, I would like to swap review with you, however, I am new to Fedora packager, not sure if I am qualified. I am still reading the Fedora packaging guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ Anyway, here is my Fedora package review request: https://bugzilla.red

Re: Review Swap

Il 14/03/20 15:13, Yongkui Han (yonhan) ha scritto: > Hi Mattia, > > I would like to swap review with you, however, I am new to Fedora packager, > not sure if I am qualified. I am still reading the Fedora packaging > guidelines: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > Any

Re: Review Swap

On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 09:46 -0500, Breno Brand Fernandes wrote: > Hi, > > Would you want to swap reviews? > This was generated with go2rpm. > It should be easy to review. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219 Hi, I will take it. Can you review dsp [1] in return? Thanks, Nikol

Re: Review swap: mediawiki-lastmodified

On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 16:00 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:57 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > As it seems to be easy one , I take it and swap with > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268 > > > > nodejs-p-try > > > > OK ? > > Sorry, Sérgio, I grabbed Anku

Re: Review swap: mediawiki-lastmodified

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 22:57:06 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 22:51 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get > > mediawiki-lastmodified[1] packaged so we can use it with our wiki. It > > adds a "Last updated ..." text

Re: Review swap: mediawiki-lastmodified

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:57 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > As it seems to be easy one , I take it and swap with > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268 > > nodejs-p-try > > OK ? Sorry, Sérgio, I grabbed Ankur's review just as you were sending this. But see my reply to him. I've got 6

Re: Review swap: mediawiki-lastmodified

Hi Ankur, On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:52 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get > mediawiki-lastmodified[1] packaged so we can use it with our wiki. It > adds a "Last updated ..." text to wiki pages so we know how current or > outdated they may be. I just

Re: Review swap: mediawiki-lastmodified

On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 22:51 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get > mediawiki-lastmodified[1] packaged so we can use it with our wiki. It > adds a "Last updated ..." text to wiki pages so we know how current > or > outdated they may be. >

Re: Review Swap

Hello, I'll be happy to swap a review against this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524 El lun., 3 feb. 2020 a las 17:57, Breno Brand Fernandes () escribió: > Hi, > > Would someone mind swapping reviews? > I am building puppet 6 for EPEL 8 and this one[1] is the very first >

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 18:57 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 30/01/2020 18:53, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi Tom , IIRC you can add me nodejs-multimatch , please > > my fasuser: sergiomb > > If you wan to maintain nodejs stuff then the best thing to do is to > join the SIG rather than asking for ACLs

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

On 30/01/2020 18:53, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi Tom , IIRC you can add me nodejs-multimatch , please my fasuser: sergiomb If you wan to maintain nodejs stuff then the best thing to do is to join the SIG rather than asking for ACLs on individual packages. If you're planning to update multimatch th

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 18:42 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 30/01/2020 18:22, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:09 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 30. 01. 20 v 5:10 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I took js-jquery-file-upload package to save js-query > > > >

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

On 30/01/2020 18:22, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:09 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 30. 01. 20 v 5:10 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): Hi, I took js-jquery-file-upload package to save js-query Great and thx. If you want by a chance to maintain also js- jquery{,1,2}, I would not mind t

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 10:09 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 30. 01. 20 v 5:10 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > > Hi, > > > > I took js-jquery-file-upload package to save js-query > > Great and thx. If you want by a chance to maintain also js- > jquery{,1,2}, > I would not mind to have co-maintainers o

Re: review swap , nodejs packages need some updates

Dne 30. 01. 20 v 5:10 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > Hi, > > I took js-jquery-file-upload package to save js-query Great and thx. If you want by a chance to maintain also js-jquery{,1,2}, I would not mind to have co-maintainers or even better to hand it over to somebody O:-) Vít > , I updated

Re: Review Swap Request

Looks like python-userpath exists already, albeit for rawhide only. I'd like to review pipx (this will be my first review). If you could in turn review mopidy-mpd, that would be greatly appreciated. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1792086 _

Re: Review swap

I can review it without swap. пт, 6 дек. 2019 г. в 03:03, Jerry James : > > One of my upstreams picked up a new documentation dependency. Who would like > to swap reviews? This one should be quick and easy. > > python-sphinx-copybutton: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780426 > > Th

Re: Review swap: virt-v2v

- Original Message - > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774713 > Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM > > This is actually more of a package split. This program was part of > libguestfs, but has been split out into a separate upstream pro

Re: Review swap?

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:17 PM Tom Callaway wrote: > > I could use a quick review for a new R package: R-Rhtslib > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767062 > > Can do a review or other packaging/legal/license favors in trade. I'll swap you for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg

Re: review swap for vcglib

Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 I also cannot find the "muftii" FAS account you listed in this bug ... Sorry, typo: it should be "mufti11" 8-( I'm available for any review in exchange. My initial targe

Re: review swap for vcglib

On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:15 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 PM J. Scheurich wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 I also cannot find the "muftii" FAS

Re: review swap for vcglib

On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 PM J. Scheurich wrote: > > Hi, > > Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 It's usually enough to ask the original reviewer to unset and set the "fedora-review: +" flag if the package

Re: Review swap: python-graph-tool (Was: Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build)

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 03:32 Ankur Sinha wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597 > I'll trade you for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763261 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Review swap (htslib)

Hi Zbigniew and Kevin Many thanks for your explanation. I clearly understand the htslib's situation now. -- Jun | He - His - Him ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap (htslib)

Jun Aruga wrote: > Someone, could give us advice about below situation, if the new > package htslib's "/usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9" is valid? > "1.9" is upstream software's version. "2" is ABI's version (so version). This can happen with non-autotools, non-libtool projects. libtool enforces some str

Re: Review swap (htslib)

On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:03:26PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote: > Someone, could give us advice about below situation, if the new > package htslib's "/usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9" is valid? > "1.9" is upstream software's version. "2" is ABI's version (so version). The patterns used in filenames of so objec

Re: Review swap (htslib)

Someone, could give us advice about below situation, if the new package htslib's "/usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9" is valid? "1.9" is upstream software's version. "2" is ABI's version (so version). ``` sh-5.0# ls -l /usr/lib64/libhts.so* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Oct 2 23:50 /usr/lib64/libhts.so ->

Re: Review swap - zeal

I can review it without swap. вт, 28 мая 2019 г. в 13:55, Lumir Balhar : > > Hello. > > I'd like to claim ownership of retired package zeal, which is currently > in weird state not available in F30. > > Original bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701666 > Review request: https://bug

Re: Review swap: newsboat

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 9:04 AM J. Scheurich wrote: > I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora > account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review)) > in return for white_dune fedora sponsoring... Mufti, don't despair! We're getting there. Let's keep

Re: Review swap: newsboat

On 15. 02. 19 17:01, J. Scheurich wrote:> I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora > account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review)) > in return for white_dune fedora sponsoring... I'm not able to sponsor new packagers, sorry. In the meantime, the re

Re: Review swap: newsboat

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 5:04 PM J. Scheurich wrote: > > Hi, > > > I have packaged terminal RSS/Atom reader newsboat [1] for Fedora, and I > > would like to have it reviewed [2] (ideally before F30 beta). Any > > volunteers? > > I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora > ac

Re: Review swap: newsboat

Hi, I have packaged terminal RSS/Atom reader newsboat [1] for Fedora, and I would like to have it reviewed [2] (ideally before F30 beta). Any volunteers? I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review)) in

Re: Review Swap - netatalk and dymo-cups-drivers

Thanks! I'll get on it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.o

Re: Review Swap - netatalk and dymo-cups-drivers

On Sat, 2019-01-05 at 14:35 +, Andrew Bauer wrote: > I've got a couple of review requests in need of a reviewer: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659709 Hello, I'll review dymo-cups-drivers, could you review qt5-qtpbfimageformat [1] in return? Thanks, Nikola [1] https://bug

Re: Review swap: python-libNeuroML

On 25.10.2018 21:17, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hello, Would someone like to swap reviews please? I have a simple python package that needs reviewing: python-libNeuroML: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643266 I've taken it. No need for any review in return. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +42

Re: Review swap: easy Python module

On vendredi 28 septembre 2018 21:15:14 CEST Gwyn Ciesla wrote: I'd like a swap with: android-file-transfer - Reliable MTP client with minimalistic UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633317 Best regards, Robert-André ___ devel mailing lis

Re: Review swap, Perl flavored

On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 23.12.22 WEST Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > > Today is my first year anniversary of contributing to Fedora, yay us! Congratulations for all your (hard) work Robert-André. :-) Regards, -- José Abílio ___ devel maili

Re: Review swap request

On 6/2/2018 1:34 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hi all, > > The linux-igd package no longer builds against the latest libupnp > package and upstream is dead so I'm going to retire it. > > To replace it I am packaging miniupnpd, which is strangely not in > Fedora while the client tool, miniupnpc,

Re: Review Swap

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to do rename of rpkg-client > (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpkg-client) to rpkg-util and also I > would like to go the package again through a review process because the spec > might deserve some care: https://b

Re: Review swap

Am Sonntag, den 03.12.2017, 19:36 +0100 schrieb Robert-André Mauchin: > On dimanche 3 décembre 2017 16:24:38 CET Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > I have a few simple gnome-shell-extension packages to offer for > > review > > and will review swap a complicated package or few

Re: Review swap

On dimanche 3 décembre 2017 16:24:38 CET Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Hello folks, > > I have a few simple gnome-shell-extension packages to offer for review > and will review swap a complicated package or few other easy to review > packages. > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=

  1   2   3   4   5   >