On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging the mhvtl project for Fedora and
EPEL. This package also
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging
On 28/05/15 23:03, David Smith wrote:
On 05/28/2015 10:26 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
... stuff deleted ...
Any thoughts or comments to this approach? Anyone got a better idea?
Your process looks reasonable.
Thanks!
Yes, I do know it is not good to have the keying material for the
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging the mhvtl project for Fedora and
EPEL. This package also contains a kernel module, which normally works
fine - until you hit Secure Boot.
On 29/05/15 14:54, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging the mhvtl project for
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 09:28 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David
On Friday 29 May 2015 15:24:24 David Sommerseth wrote:
On 28/05/15 23:03, David Smith wrote:
snip
But really the best solution here is to get the mhvtl kernel module
upstream.
Agreed, but I'm not sure how keen upstream kernel developers are to
carry a driver for virtual tape devices.
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 09:28 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 09:28 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/05/15 17:04, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2015 15:24:24 David Sommerseth wrote:
On 28/05/15 23:03, David Smith wrote:
snip
But really the best solution here is to get the mhvtl kernel
module upstream.
Agreed, but I'm not
On 05/28/2015 10:26 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
... stuff deleted ...
Any thoughts or comments to this approach? Anyone got a better idea?
Your process looks reasonable.
Yes, I do know it is not good to have the keying material for the
signing too easily available. So I'm also keen to
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging the mhvtl project for Fedora and
EPEL. This package also contains a kernel module, which normally works
fine - until you hit Secure Boot.
So I was wondering how to handle
13 matches
Mail list logo