Hi,
Will F15 (and maybe also newer F14 kernels?) support the RTL8191SEvB
Wireless LAN Controller? AFAIK at least stock F14 does not support it.
Thx,
--
--Jos Vos j...@xos.nl
--X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
--Amsterdam, The Netherlands| Fax:
On Mar 3, 2011, at 7:54 AM, Jos Vos wrote:
Hi,
Will F15 (and maybe also newer F14 kernels?) support the RTL8191SEvB
Wireless LAN Controller? AFAIK at least stock F14 does not support it.
Looks like it, based on the addition of the rtl8192ce driver upstream
in 2.6.38, which includes support
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:35:12AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Looks like it, based on the addition of the rtl8192ce driver upstream
in 2.6.38, which includes support for multiple 8191 devices as well.
Knowing your PCI device ID would lead to more certainty. Devices the
driver claims to
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:53:23PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:35:12AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Looks like it, based on the addition of the rtl8192ce driver upstream
in 2.6.38, which includes support for multiple 8191 devices as well.
Knowing your PCI device ID
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:27:45AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
If I correctly interpret the data from smolt (which reports pci ids
in decimal? really?), it looks like the pci id for the device in
question is 10EC:8172. Unfortunately, none of the current rtlwifi
sub-drivers claim that ID.
On 03/03/2011 07:27 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
If I correctly interpret the data from smolt (which reports pci ids
in decimal? really?), ...
Yes, using decimal for PCI vendor:product impedes usability.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494142
which was entered two years ago and
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 10:27 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
If I correctly interpret the data from smolt (which reports pci ids
in decimal? really?)
Yes, really. You're not the first to notice this is a huge pile of crack
=)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:39:26PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:27:45AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
If I correctly interpret the data from smolt (which reports pci ids
in decimal? really?), it looks like the pci id for the device in
question is 10EC:8172.