El Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:27:45 -0600
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us escribió:
starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide
for gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday.
as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739)
packagers will have just over a week, until
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:53:11 -0600,
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
The Bulk of the mass rebuild is done and will shortly be tagged into
f17 http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f17-failures.html is a list of the
packages that failed to build. im working on double checking that we
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
One thing that became clear during the mass rebuild is that people are
not following the proper procedure to retire packages
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
lists the current process.
Timing could have been better. But the workflow I'm going to work towards is
the have fedpkg retire handle got and pkgdb then have pkgdb handle the koji
side. With the end result being that you just do 1 thing.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Iain Arnell
commit c660ad3c9a8931a3df09ff654e1c4bc0e46a0765
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Jan 10 15:56:04 2012 +
Rebuild for gcc 4.7 in Rawhide
perl-Class-Load-XS.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-Load-XS.spec b/perl
commit e193a9af5a29730aafa6276a9d2467d2d6f59c7a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Jan 10 16:20:31 2012 +
Rebuild for gcc 4.7 in Rawhide
perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
commit c5f5abcf1e8ebb00cfd41ffd90498c6d2b66689a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Jan 10 16:21:25 2012 +
Rebuild for gcc 4.7 in Rawhide
perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Compress-Raw
commit 251813a58f30d291d9c9df91fece9556431d1b5d
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Jan 10 16:22:17 2012 +
Rebuild for gcc 4.7 in Rawhide
perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Compress-Raw
On 2012-01-04, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide
for gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday.
as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739)
On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I just didn't know if there was any filtering going on for the mass
rebuild or if all packages, regardless of dependence on gcc were going
to be rebuilt.
My understanding is that we traditionally rebuild everything at the time
of a mass rebuild,
El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com escribió:
On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I just didn't know if there was any filtering going on for the
mass rebuild or if all packages, regardless of dependence on gcc
were going to be rebuilt.
My
On 2012-01-05 19:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
ideally drop all the disttags prior to fc17
I hope I'm just having trouble parsing this correctly. Could you rephrase?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2012-01-05 19:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
ideally drop all the disttags prior to fc17
I hope I'm just having trouble parsing this correctly. Could you
rephrase?
Rebuild all packages, so they end up with fc17 disttags, to help avoid the
why do I have a fc15 package
On 2012-01-05 20:34, Rex Dieter wrote:
Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2012-01-05 19:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
ideally drop all the disttags prior to fc17
I hope I'm just having trouble parsing this correctly. Could you
rephrase?
Rebuild all packages, so they end up with fc17 disttags, to help
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com escribió:
On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I just didn't know if there was any filtering going on for the
mass rebuild or if all packages, regardless of
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com escribió:
On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I just didn't know if there was any
On 01/05/2012 09:21 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500
Tom Callawaytcall...@redhat.com escribió:
On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I just didn't know if there was any filtering going on for the
mass
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 21:47 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I guess you are referring an ordered rebuild, not a simple sequential
rebuild.
The latter would be mostly useless.
For bootstrapping, ideally there would be ordered rebuilds, but even any
mass rebuild assists more than having none at
On 01/05/2012 10:06 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 21:47 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I guess you are referring an ordered rebuild, not a simple sequential
rebuild.
The latter would be mostly useless.
For bootstrapping, ideally there would be ordered rebuilds, but even any
On 01/04/2012 06:27 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide for gcc-4.7
that landed yesterday.
as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739)
packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 to build
packages
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 22:38 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
They do not mean the resulting packages are more or less broken than
those having been built by predecessors of the toolchains.
Neither does an ordered rebuild. Even assuming the concept of
ordering was any more well defined than
On 01/05/2012 03:10 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
I've seen nils' list and a few of my packages are on it. What can we do
now to fix it? I've noticed some koji builds for the new compiler but
other than that, should I wait for the FTB.. to come in?
One of my packages was on the list, it had a
On 01/05/2012 11:55 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 22:38 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
They do not mean the resulting packages are more or less broken than
those having been built by predecessors of the toolchains.
Neither does an ordered rebuild. Even assuming the concept of
starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide for gcc-4.7
that landed yesterday.
as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739)
packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 to build
packages themselves. After that date releng will kick off an
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide for
gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday.
as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739)
packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday
starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide for gcc-4.7
that landed yesterday.
as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739)
packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 to build
packages themselves. After that date releng will kick off an
26 matches
Mail list logo
