Re: Renewing the Modularity objective

2019-09-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:33 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > I'm still missing an offical recognition that there can be modules under > development in stable Fedora. Otherwise we have no way of developing new > modules. Fedora tries very hard to align module lifecycle to Fedora > lifecycle. It does not w

Re: Renewing the Modularity objective

2019-09-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 02:10:11PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Is it really good to replace the old objective with the new one? > Shouldn't we archive off that one and call this one something else so > you can see what was done when? Possibly! We've done the modularity objective in phases so far,

Re: Renewing the Modularity objective

2019-09-23 Thread jkonecny
ead the proposal at: > https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/council-docs/pull-request/61#request_diff > > The Council will vote on this in two weeks. > > This is also posted to the Community Blog: > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/renewing-the-modularity-objective/ >

Re: Renewing the Modularity objective

2019-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 03:30:58PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > Now that Modularity is available for all Fedora variants, it's time to > address issues discovered and improve the experience for packagers and > users. The Modularity team identified a number of projects that will > improve the usefulne

Re: Renewing the Modularity objective

2019-09-19 Thread Jun Aruga
> I'd suggest that the Modularity team could preapre a list of example > use cases that will present the strenghts of the modularity. I just share below my project for me to investigate use cases to switch a modules stream with Fedora (and RHEL) container and Travis CI. It's not general module exa

Re: Renewing the Modularity objective

2019-09-19 Thread Michal Schorm
> When MySQL 8 is being developed and being packages as module, do you > build the module for Rawhide only or for all Fedoras? > > If you build it for all Fedoras, how do you deal with incompatible > changes during the MySQL 8 developement. I'm hitting on the Fedora > Updates Policy that forbids in

Re: Renewing the Modularity objective

2019-09-19 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-09-19, Michal Schorm wrote: > While the new major version of the database is being developed, I'd > love to pack it in Fedora, test it, offer it to the users and provide > feedback to the upstream, solving the uprising issues with them way > before the GA. > Because I want to keep a stable

Re: Renewing the Modularity objective

2019-09-19 Thread Michal Schorm
-Council/council-docs/pull-request/61#request_diff > > The Council will vote on this in two weeks. > > This is also posted to the Community Blog: > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/renewing-the-modularity-objective/ > > -- > Ben Cotton > He / Him / His > Fedora Prog

Renewing the Modularity objective

2019-09-18 Thread Ben Cotton
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/renewing-the-modularity-objective/ -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to dev