Re: Reopening: Q: webfonts:

2013-12-06 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote: > This solution is much nicer and can be used by other font packages as well. > > Here's the new package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036754 Very awesome, thanks! I'll sponsor you and review. :-) Luckily, I pushed off the we

Re: Reopening: Q: webfonts:

2013-12-02 Thread Petr Vobornik
On 11/30/2013 09:04 PM, Paul Flo Williams wrote: Petr Vobornik wrote: Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Just write a fontforge or ttx script that flips this bit at rpm build time, assuming you've done your legal review correctly the bit is in contradiction with the font license (if the font was no instal

Re: Reopening: Q: webfonts:

2013-11-30 Thread Paul Flo Williams
Petr Vobornik wrote: >> Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >>> >>> Just write a fontforge or ttx script that flips this bit at rpm build >>> time, assuming you've done your legal review correctly the bit is in >>> contradiction with the font license (if the font was no installable we >>> could not package it i

Re: Reopening: Q: webfonts:

2013-11-28 Thread Petr Vobornik
On 11/28/2013 02:25 PM, Paul Flo Williams wrote: Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mer 27 novembre 2013 15:39, Petr Vobornik a écrit : OTF/TTF fails in all modern versions of IE when the font does not have embedding permissions set to 'installable' [1]. It's more common that one would say. Of cour

Re: Reopening: Q: webfonts:

2013-11-28 Thread Paul Flo Williams
Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le Mer 27 novembre 2013 15:39, Petr Vobornik a écrit : >> >> OTF/TTF fails in all modern versions of IE when the font does not have >> embedding permissions set to 'installable' [1]. It's more common that >> one would say. > > Of course it is very common, it's the defaul

Re: Reopening: Q: webfonts:

2013-11-27 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Mer 27 novembre 2013 15:39, Petr Vobornik a écrit : > Hi, > > I would like to reopen the discussion about packaging web fonts since > its conclusion(below) is not very usable. > > The issue I'm dealing with is that we want FreeIPA Web UI to use Open > Sans and Font Awesome(FA) font. FA is being

Reopening: Q: webfonts:

2013-11-27 Thread Petr Vobornik
Hi, I would like to reopen the discussion about packaging web fonts since its conclusion(below) is not very usable. The issue I'm dealing with is that we want FreeIPA Web UI to use Open Sans and Font Awesome(FA) font. FA is being packaged and I planned to package Open Sans (Apache license v2