I'm working on fixing a few long standing bugs in fedpkg that have to do
with our branch structure
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619979 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622592).
This has me examining our branch structure again and trying to remember
why exactly I chos
On 12/3/2010 18:34, Jesse Keating wrote:
> The original thought was to have top level branches that are named after
> distribution releases, eg "f14", "f15", "el5". Then we would force
> branches of those branches use a naming structure of "f14/topic". The
> reason was so that our tooling could l
Dne 4.12.2010 06:33, Garrett Holmstrom napsal(a):
> Why tie branch names down to specific releases? While that scheme makes
> it easy for fedpkg to guess what release to attempt to build against
> when one only cares about one release, it makes little sense to call a
> branch "f14-rh123456" whe
On 12/04/2010 12:19 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Related issue I have with the Fedora git repositories is that one cannot
> remove any branch once it is created. After I have created in bitlbee
> repo two topic branches, only to find out that I cannot remove them
> after the merge. I can understand need
- "Jesse Keating" wrote:
> I'm working on fixing a few long standing bugs in fedpkg that have to
> do
> with our branch structure
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619979 and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622592).
>
> This has me examining our branch structure a
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 16:34:05 -0800,
Jesse Keating wrote:
> "f14/user/fred/topic/mybranch" or other such craziness. When I went to
> test this, I realized that git won't allow you to have both "f14" and
> "f14/topic" as branches, because of the way the git metadata works on
Does there need
Jesse Keating writes:
> However, if a user had a local
> branch of f14 or f14/master they will be left with mismatched
> .git/config entries. In this case it's easiest to delete the local
> branch (git branch -d f14) and check it out again.
Or git branch --set-upstream.
Andreas.
--
Andreas S
On 12/03/2010 09:33 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 12/3/2010 18:34, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> The original thought was to have top level branches that are named after
>> distribution releases, eg "f14", "f15", "el5". Then we would force
>> branches of those branches use a naming structure of "f14
On 12/04/2010 02:19 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 4.12.2010 06:33, Garrett Holmstrom napsal(a):
>> Why tie branch names down to specific releases? While that scheme makes
>> it easy for fedpkg to guess what release to attempt to build against
>> when one only cares about one release, it makes litt
On 12/04/2010 02:31 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 12:19 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> Related issue I have with the Fedora git repositories is that one cannot
>> remove any branch once it is created. After I have created in bitlbee
>> repo two topic branches, only to find out that I cannot rem
On 12/04/2010 07:24 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Also we would need to get a new fedpkg into the hands of all the
>> > developers that handles the new branchnames. We could do a build
>> > that
>> > handles both the oldnames and the new and have it out and available
>> > for
>> > a reasonable per
On 12/04/2010 09:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 16:34:05 -0800,
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> "f14/user/fred/topic/mybranch" or other such craziness. When I went to
>> test this, I realized that git won't allow you to have both "f14" and
>> "f14/topic" as branches, because
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 12:33:40 -0800,
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 09:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > Is this going to break things for people that having set up origin tracking
> > for multiple releases in the same repo?
>
> Can you explain this a bit more please?
I currently
On 12/06/2010 01:10 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jesse Keating writes:
>
>> However, if a user had a local
>> branch of f14 or f14/master they will be left with mismatched
>> .git/config entries. In this case it's easiest to delete the local
>> branch (git branch -d f14) and check it out again.
>
On 12/06/2010 12:44 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 12:33:40 -0800,
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 12/04/2010 09:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this going to break things for people that having set up origin tracking
>>> for multiple releases in the same repo?
>>
>>
On 12/03/2010 04:34 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> So please, tell me what you think!
I've created a wiki page to track this effort. Feel free to reply to
this email thread or to comment on the wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dist_Git_Branch_Proposal
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² i
16 matches
Mail list logo
